mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ContrasInver: Ultra-Sparse Label Semi-supervised Regression for Multi-dimensional Seismic Inversion

arXiv 2302.06441 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2023physics.geo-ph cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The automated interpretation and inversion of seismic data have advanced significantly with the development of Deep Learning (DL) methods. However, these methods often require numerous costly well logs, limiting their application only to mature or synthetic data. This paper presents ContrasInver, a method that achieves seismic inversion using as few as two or three well logs, significantly reducing current requirements. In ContrasInver, we propose three key innovations to address the challenges of applying semi-supervised learning to regression tasks with ultra-sparse labels. The Multi-dimensional Sample Generation (MSG) technique pioneers a paradigm for sample generation in multi-dimensional inversion. It produces a large number of diverse samples from a single well, while establishing lateral continuity in seismic data. MSG yields substantial improvements over current techniques, even without the use of semi-supervised learning. The Region-Growing Training (RGT) strategy leverages the inherent continuity of seismic data, effectively propagating accuracy from closer to more distant regions based on the proximity of well logs. The Impedance Vectorization Projection (IVP) vectorizes impedance values and performs semi-supervised learning in a compressed space. We demonstrated that the Jacobian matrix derived from this space can filter out some outlier components in pseudo-label vectors, thereby solving the value confusion issue in semi-supervised regression learning. In the experiments, ContrasInver achieved state-of-the-art performance in the synthetic data SEAM I. In the field data with two or three well logs, only the methods based on the components proposed in this paper were able to achieve reasonable results. It's the first data-driven approach yielding reliable results on the Netherlands F3 and Delft, using only three and two well logs respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2023.

Builds on

36 of 77 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  6. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  7. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,476
  8. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,420
  9. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
  10. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
  11. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  12. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
24 more
  1. 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
  2. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 510
  3. 2021Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Cross Pseudo Supervisioncited by 463
  4. 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
  5. 2020Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Cross-Consistency Trainingcited by 376
  6. 2020Propagate Yourself: Exploring Pixel-Level Consistency for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 297
  7. 2022Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation Using Unreliable Pseudo-Labelscited by 218
  8. 2021ST++: Make Self-training Work Better for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 184
  9. 2018Adversarial Learning for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 173
  10. 2019Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with High- and Low-level Consistencycited by 147
  11. 2021Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Pixel-Level Contrastive Learning from a Class-wise Memory Bankcited by 125
  12. 2020Guided Collaborative Training for Pixel-wise Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 120
  13. 2021Pixel Contrastive-Consistent Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 101
  14. 2020DMT: Dynamic Mutual Training for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 77
  15. 2022Class-Aware Contrastive Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 62
  16. 2019A Machine Learning Benchmark for Facies Classificationcited by 27
  17. 2022Contrastive Regularization for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 24
  18. 2018Deep semi-supervised segmentation with weight-averaged consistency targetscited by 21
  19. 2021Attention-Based 3D Seismic Fault Segmentation Training by a Few 2D Slice Labelscited by 6
  20. 2021MD Loss: Efficient Training of 3D Seismic Fault Segmentation Network under Sparse Labels by Weakening Anomaly Annotationcited by 6
  21. 2022Dual Multi-scale Mean Teacher Network for Semi-supervised Infection Segmentation in Chest CT Volume for COVID-19cited by 4
  22. 2019SalSi: A new seismic attribute for salt dome detectioncited by 3
  23. 2022MDA GAN: Adversarial-Learning-based 3-D Seismic Data Interpolation and Reconstruction for Complex Missingcited by 3
  24. 2021Semi-supervised Impedance Inversion by Bayesian Neural Network Based on 2-d CNN Pre-trainingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.