mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

MD Loss: Efficient Training of 3D Seismic Fault Segmentation Network under Sparse Labels by Weakening Anomaly Annotation

arXiv 2110.05319 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2021cs.CV eess.IV physics.geo-phcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data-driven fault detection has been regarded as a 3D image segmentation task. The models trained from synthetic data are difficult to generalize in some surveys. Recently, training 3D fault segmentation using sparse manual 2D slices is thought to yield promising results, but manual labeling has many false negative labels (abnormal annotations), which is detrimental to training and consequently to detection performance. Motivated to train 3D fault segmentation networks under sparse 2D labels while suppressing false negative labels, we analyze the training process gradient and propose the Mask Dice (MD) loss. Moreover, the fault is an edge feature, and current encoder-decoder architectures widely used for fault detection (e.g., U-shape network) are not conducive to edge representation. Consequently, Fault-Net is proposed, which is designed for the characteristics of faults, employs high-resolution propagation features, and embeds MultiScale Compression Fusion block to fuse multi-scale information, which allows the edge information to be fully preserved during propagation and fusion, thus enabling advanced performance via few computational resources. Experimental demonstrates that MD loss supports the inclusion of human experience in training and suppresses false negative labels therein, enabling baseline models to improve performance and generalize to more surveys. Fault-Net is capable to provide a more stable and reliable interpretation of faults, it uses extremely low computational resources and inference is significantly faster than other models. Our method indicates optimal performance in comparison with several mainstream methods.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2021.

Builds on

9 of 42 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,656
  2. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,849
  3. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,287
  4. 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,522
  5. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,475
  6. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,418
  7. 2020A Survey on Deep Neural Network Compression: Challenges, Overview, and Solutionscited by 32
  8. 2020Segmentation Loss Odysseycited by 7
  9. 2021Attention-Based 3D Seismic Fault Segmentation Training by a Few 2D Slice Labelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

6 papers.