Attention-Based 3D Seismic Fault Segmentation Training by a Few 2D Slice Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Detection faults in seismic data is a crucial step for seismic structural interpretation, reservoir characterization and well placement. Some recent works regard it as an image segmentation task. The task of image segmentation requires huge labels, especially 3D seismic data, which has a complex structure and lots of noise. Therefore, its annotation requires expert experience and a huge workload. In this study, we present lambda-BCE and lambda-smooth L1loss to effectively train 3D-CNN by some slices from 3D seismic data, so that the model can learn the segmentation of 3D seismic data from a few 2D slices. In order to fully extract information from limited data and suppress seismic noise, we propose an attention module that can be used for active supervision training and embedded in the network. The attention heatmap label is generated by the original label, and letting it supervise the attention module using the lambda-smooth L1loss. The experiment demonstrates the effectiveness of our loss function, the method can extract 3D seismic features from a few 2D slice labels. And it also shows the advanced performance of the attention module, which can significantly suppress the noise in the seismic data while increasing the model's sensitivity to the foreground. Finally, on the public test set, we only use the 2D slice labels training that accounts for 3.3% of the 3D volume label, and achieve similar performance to the 3D volume label training.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2021.
Builds on
9 of 37 references.
References · 9
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
- 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,293
- 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,476
- 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,435
- 2016Convolutional Pose Machinescited by 325
- 2019Improving the Harmony of the Composite Image by Spatial-Separated Attention Modulecited by 73
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021MD Loss: Efficient Training of 3D Seismic Fault Segmentation Network under Sparse Labels by Weakening Anomaly Annotationcited by 6
- 2022MDA GAN: Adversarial-Learning-based 3-D Seismic Data Interpolation and Reconstruction for Complex Missingcited by 3
- 2024CRACKS: Crowdsourcing Resources for Analysis and Categorization of Key Subsurface faultscited by 2
- 2023ContrasInver: Ultra-Sparse Label Semi-supervised Regression for Multi-dimensional Seismic Inversioncited by 1
- 2022CONSS: Contrastive Learning Approach for Semi-Supervised Seismic Facies Classificationcited by 0
- 2025Geological Everything Model 3D: A Promptable Foundation Model for Unified and Zero-Shot Subsurface Understandingcited by 0
- 2025Geological Everything Model 3D: A Promptable Foundation Model for Unified and Zero-Shot Subsurface Understanding1 Jul 2025
- 2024CRACKS: Crowdsourcing Resources for Analysis and Categorization of Key Subsurface faults20 Aug 2024
- 2023ContrasInver: Ultra-Sparse Label Semi-supervised Regression for Multi-dimensional Seismic Inversion13 Feb 2023
- 2022CONSS: Contrastive Learning Approach for Semi-Supervised Seismic Facies Classification10 Oct 2022
- 2022MDA GAN: Adversarial-Learning-based 3-D Seismic Data Interpolation and Reconstruction for Complex Missing7 Apr 2022
- 2021MD Loss: Efficient Training of 3D Seismic Fault Segmentation Network under Sparse Labels by Weakening Anomaly Annotation11 Oct 2021