mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Debiasing Recommendation by Learning Identifiable Latent Confounders

arXiv 2302.05052 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.IRcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recommendation systems aim to predict users' feedback on items not exposed to them. Confounding bias arises due to the presence of unmeasured variables (e.g., the socio-economic status of a user) that can affect both a user's exposure and feedback. Existing methods either (1) make untenable assumptions about these unmeasured variables or (2) directly infer latent confounders from users' exposure. However, they cannot guarantee the identification of counterfactual feedback, which can lead to biased predictions. In this work, we propose a novel method, i.e., identifiable deconfounder (iDCF), which leverages a set of proxy variables (e.g., observed user features) to resolve the aforementioned non-identification issue. The proposed iDCF is a general deconfounded recommendation framework that applies proximal causal inference to infer the unmeasured confounders and identify the counterfactual feedback with theoretical guarantees. Extensive experiments on various real-world and synthetic datasets verify the proposed method's effectiveness and robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2023.

Builds on

22 of 45 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  3. 2017Deep Interest Network for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 541
  4. 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 494
  5. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
  6. 2016Identifying Causal Effects With Proxy Variables of an Unmeasured Confoundercited by 138
  7. 2018Invariance, Causality and Robustnesscited by 123
  8. 2021Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 116
  9. 2018The Blessings of Multiple Causescited by 103
  10. 2020Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemcited by 94
  11. 2020An Introduction to Proximal Causal Learningcited by 91
  12. 2022KuaiRand: An Unbiased Sequential Recommendation Dataset with Randomly Exposed Videoscited by 69
10 more
  1. 2021A Survey on Accuracy-oriented Neural Recommendation: From Collaborative Filtering to Information-rich Recommendationcited by 59
  2. 2021Deconfounded Recommendation for Alleviating Bias Amplificationcited by 51
  3. 2022Deconfounding Duration Bias in Watch-time Prediction for Video Recommendationcited by 37
  4. 2018A confounding bridge approach for double negative control inference on causal effectscited by 36
  5. 2019On Multi-Cause Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounding: Counterexamples, Impossibility, and Alternativescited by 20
  6. 2022A Model-Agnostic Causal Learning Framework for Recommendation using Search Datacited by 17
  7. 2020Identifying effects of multiple treatments in the presence of unmeasured confoundingcited by 16
  8. 2022Addressing Confounding Feature Issue for Causal Recommendationcited by 12
  9. 2022Mitigating Hidden Confounding Effects for Causal Recommendationcited by 8
  10. 2020Na"ive regression requires weaker assumptions than factor models to adjust for multiple cause confoundingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.