mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Addressing Confounding Feature Issue for Causal Recommendation

arXiv 2205.06532 ↗First posted 13 May 2022cs.IRcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recommender system, some feature directly affects whether an interaction would happen, making the happened interactions not necessarily indicate user preference. For instance, short videos are objectively easier to be finished even though the user does not like the video. We term such feature as confounding feature, and video length is a confounding feature in video recommendation. If we fit a model on such interaction data, just as done by most data-driven recommender systems, the model will be biased to recommend short videos more, and deviate from user actual requirement. This work formulates and addresses the problem from the causal perspective. Assuming there are some factors affecting both the confounding feature and other item features, e.g., the video creator, we find the confounding feature opens a backdoor path behind user item matching and introduces spurious correlation. To remove the effect of backdoor path, we propose a framework named Deconfounding Causal Recommendation (DCR), which performs intervened inference with do-calculus. Nevertheless, evaluating do calculus requires to sum over the prediction on all possible values of confounding feature, significantly increasing the time cost. To address the efficiency challenge, we further propose a mixture-of experts (MoE) model architecture, modeling each value of confounding feature with a separate expert module. Through this way, we retain the model expressiveness with few additional costs. We demonstrate DCR on the backbone model of neural factorization machine (NFM), showing that DCR leads to more accurate prediction of user preference with small inference time cost.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 May 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Deep Causal Reasoning for Recommendations
  2. 2023Causal Inference in Recommender Systems: A Survey of Strategies for Bias Mitigation, Explanation, and Generalization
  3. 2025Causal Inspired Multi Modal Recommendation
  4. 2025CIRR: Causal-Invariant Retrieval-Augmented Recommendation with Faithful Explanations under Distribution Shift
  5. 2026MCLMR: A Model-Agnostic Causal Learning Framework for Multi-Behavior Recommendation
  6. 2026FlowTime: Towards Continuous Generative Watch Time Prediction via Flow-based Personalized Priors
  7. 2025Short-Form Video Recommendations with Multimodal Embeddings: Addressing Cold-Start and Bias Challenges
  8. 2026Safety as a Constraint: Fine-Tuning a LLM Recommender to Explain Itself