MixFormer: End-to-End Tracking with Iterative Mixed Attention
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual object tracking often employs a multi-stage pipeline of feature extraction, target information integration, and bounding box estimation. To simplify this pipeline and unify the process of feature extraction and target information integration, in this paper, we present a compact tracking framework, termed as MixFormer, built upon transformers. Our core design is to utilize the flexibility of attention operations, and propose a Mixed Attention Module (MAM) for simultaneous feature extraction and target information integration. This synchronous modeling scheme allows to extract target-specific discriminative features and perform extensive communication between target and search area. Based on MAM, we build our MixFormer trackers simply by stacking multiple MAMs and placing a localization head on top. Specifically, we instantiate two types of MixFormer trackers, a hierarchical tracker MixCvT, and a non-hierarchical tracker MixViT. For these two trackers, we investigate a series of pre-training methods and uncover the different behaviors between supervised pre-training and self-supervised pre-training in our MixFormer trackers. We also extend the masked pre-training to our MixFormer trackers and design the competitive TrackMAE pre-training technique. Finally, to handle multiple target templates during online tracking, we devise an asymmetric attention scheme in MAM to reduce computational cost, and propose an effective score prediction module to select high-quality templates. Our MixFormer trackers set a new state-of-the-art performance on seven tracking benchmarks, including LaSOT, TrackingNet, VOT2020, GOT-10k, OTB100 and UAV123. In particular, our MixViT-L achieves AUC score of 73.3% on LaSOT, 86.1% on TrackingNet, EAO of 0.584 on VOT2020, and AO of 75.7% on GOT-10k. Code and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/MCG-NJU/MixFormer.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 73 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2023.
Builds on
73 of 93 references.
References · 73
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,375
- 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,962
- 2019Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and A Loss for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 1,368
38 more
- 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,322
- 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,153
- 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,101
- 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 947
- 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 902
- 2022Exploring Plain Vision Transformer Backbones for Object Detectioncited by 724
- 2016Fully-Convolutional Siamese Networks for Object Trackingcited by 568
- 2018GOT-10k: A Large High-Diversity Benchmark for Generic Object Tracking in the Wildcited by 475
- 2019Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 459
- 2018SiamRPN++: Evolution of Siamese Visual Tracking with Very Deep Networkscited by 446
- 2019Video Object Segmentation using Space-Time Memory Networkscited by 438
- 2018LaSOT: A High-quality Benchmark for Large-scale Single Object Trackingcited by 429
- 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 419
- 2021Transformer Trackingcited by 412
- 2021Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Trackingcited by 350
- 2019Learning Discriminative Model Prediction for Trackingcited by 344
- 2018TrackingNet: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Object Tracking in the Wildcited by 343
- 2022Joint Feature Learning and Relation Modeling for Tracking: A One-Stream Frameworkcited by 330
- 2018ATOM: Accurate Tracking by Overlap Maximizationcited by 285
- 2018Fast Online Object Tracking and Segmentation: A Unifying Approachcited by 272
- 2016ECO: Efficient Convolution Operators for Trackingcited by 239
- 2020Probabilistic Regression for Visual Trackingcited by 231
- 2021LocalViT: Analyzing Locality in Vision Transformerscited by 228
- 2021Transformer Meets Tracker: Exploiting Temporal Context for Robust Visual Trackingcited by 220
- 2020Ocean: Object-aware Anchor-free Trackingcited by 212
- 2015Learning Multi-Domain Convolutional Neural Networks for Visual Trackingcited by 209
- 2020Siamese Box Adaptive Network for Visual Trackingcited by 189
- 2018Distractor-aware Siamese Networks for Visual Object Trackingcited by 187
- 2019SiamFC++: Towards Robust and Accurate Visual Tracking with Target Estimation Guidelinescited by 177
- 2019Siam R-CNN: Visual Tracking by Re-Detectioncited by 174
- 2019SiamCAR: Siamese Fully Convolutional Classification and Regression for Visual Trackingcited by 148
- 2022AiATrack: Attention in Attention for Transformer Visual Trackingcited by 137
- 2021Learning Target Candidate Association to Keep Track of What Not to Trackcited by 131
- 2021SwinTrack: A Simple and Strong Baseline for Transformer Trackingcited by 126
- 2020Know Your Surroundings: Exploiting Scene Information for Object Trackingcited by 119
- 2022Backbone is All Your Need: A Simplified Architecture for Visual Object Trackingcited by 119
- 2022Transforming Model Prediction for Trackingcited by 117
- 2020Generalized Focal Loss V2: Learning Reliable Localization Quality Estimation for Dense Object Detectioncited by 104
50 most cited of 73 All 73 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.