Towards Adversarial Realism and Robust Learning for IoT Intrusion Detection and Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Internet of Things (IoT) faces tremendous security challenges. Machine learning models can be used to tackle the growing number of cyber-attack variations targeting IoT systems, but the increasing threat posed by adversarial attacks restates the need for reliable defense strategies. This work describes the types of constraints required for a realistic adversarial cyber-attack example and proposes a methodology for a trustworthy adversarial robustness analysis with a realistic adversarial evasion attack vector. The proposed methodology was used to evaluate three supervised algorithms, Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and one unsupervised algorithm, Isolation Forest (IFOR). Constrained adversarial examples were generated with the Adaptative Perturbation Pattern Method (A2PM), and evasion attacks were performed against models created with regular and adversarial training. Even though RF was the least affected in binary classification, XGB consistently achieved the highest accuracy in multi-class classification. The obtained results evidence the inherent susceptibility of tree-based algorithms and ensembles to adversarial evasion attacks and demonstrates the benefits of adversarial training and a security by design approach for a more robust IoT network intrusion detection and cyber-attack classification.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2023.
Builds on
21 of 52 references.
References · 21
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
- 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 579
- 2020Backdoor Learning: A Surveycited by 412
- 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 350
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
- 2018Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalizationcited by 171
- 2018Towards the Development of Realistic Botnet Dataset in the Internet of Things for Network Forensic Analytics: Bot-IoT Datasetcited by 98
- 2015Evasion and Hardening of Tree Ensemble Classifierscited by 44
- 2019Robust Decision Trees Against Adversarial Examplescited by 40
- 2017Security Evaluation of Pattern Classifiers under Attackcited by 39
9 more
- 2021Modeling Realistic Adversarial Attacks against Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 39
- 2020Efficient Training of Robust Decision Trees Against Adversarial Examplescited by 24
- 2019Machine Learning Based Network Vulnerability Analysis of Industrial Internet of Thingscited by 17
- 2022Adaptative Perturbation Patterns: Realistic Adversarial Learning for Robust Intrusion Detectioncited by 13
- 2019Security of the Internet of Things: Vulnerabilities, Attacks and Countermeasurescited by 12
- 2019Hardening Random Forest Cyber Detectors Against Adversarial Attackscited by 12
- 2020Adversarial Attacks on Machine Learning Cybersecurity Defences in Industrial Control Systemscited by 10
- 2021A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for IoT Intrusion Detectioncited by 10
- 2021Launching Adversarial Attacks against Network Intrusion Detection Systems for IoTcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023SoK: Realistic Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Intelligent Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 9
- 2023Constrained Adversarial Learning for Automated Software Testing: a literature reviewcited by 6
- 2024An Adversarial Robustness Benchmark for Enterprise Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 3
- 2024Reliable Feature Selection for Adversarially Robust Cyber-Attack Detectioncited by 3
- 2024Efficient Network Traffic Feature Sets for IoT Intrusion Detectioncited by 2
- 2026Cross-Domain Generalization Failure in Lightweight Intrusion Detection Models for IIoT Networkscited by 2
- 2023IoTGeM: Generalizable Models for Behaviour-Based IoT Attack Detectioncited by 1
- 2024A Novel Perturb-ability Score to Mitigate Evasion Adversarial Attacks on Flow-Based ML-NIDScited by 1
- 2024Flow Exporter Impact on Intelligent Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 1
- 2023Adversarial Robustness and Feature Impact Analysis for Driver Drowsiness Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Cross-Domain Generalization Failure in Lightweight Intrusion Detection Models for IIoT Networks1 Jul 2026
- 2024Flow Exporter Impact on Intelligent Intrusion Detection Systems18 Dec 2024
- 2024A Novel Perturb-ability Score to Mitigate Evasion Adversarial Attacks on Flow-Based ML-NIDS11 Sep 2024
- 2024Efficient Network Traffic Feature Sets for IoT Intrusion Detection12 Jun 2024
- 2024Reliable Feature Selection for Adversarially Robust Cyber-Attack Detection5 Apr 2024
- 2024An Adversarial Robustness Benchmark for Enterprise Network Intrusion Detection25 Feb 2024
- 2023IoTGeM: Generalizable Models for Behaviour-Based IoT Attack Detection17 Oct 2023
- 2023SoK: Realistic Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Intelligent Network Intrusion Detection13 Aug 2023
- 2023Adversarial Robustness and Feature Impact Analysis for Driver Drowsiness Detection23 Mar 2023
- 2023Constrained Adversarial Learning for Automated Software Testing: a literature review14 Mar 2023