mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adaptative Perturbation Patterns: Realistic Adversarial Learning for Robust Intrusion Detection

arXiv 2203.04234 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2022cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial attacks pose a major threat to machine learning and to the systems that rely on it. In the cybersecurity domain, adversarial cyber-attack examples capable of evading detection are especially concerning. Nonetheless, an example generated for a domain with tabular data must be realistic within that domain. This work establishes the fundamental constraint levels required to achieve realism and introduces the Adaptative Perturbation Pattern Method (A2PM) to fulfill these constraints in a gray-box setting. A2PM relies on pattern sequences that are independently adapted to the characteristics of each class to create valid and coherent data perturbations. The proposed method was evaluated in a cybersecurity case study with two scenarios: Enterprise and Internet of Things (IoT) networks. Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Random Forest (RF) classifiers were created with regular and adversarial training, using the CIC-IDS2017 and IoT-23 datasets. In each scenario, targeted and untargeted attacks were performed against the classifiers, and the generated examples were compared with the original network traffic flows to assess their realism. The obtained results demonstrate that A2PM provides a scalable generation of realistic adversarial examples, which can be advantageous for both adversarial training and attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2022.

Builds on

25 of 50 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  5. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  6. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  7. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  8. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  9. 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 656
  10. 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 579
  11. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 459
  12. 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 420
13 more
  1. 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 350
  2. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  3. 2018Adversarial Attack on Graph Structured Datacited by 300
  4. 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 181
  5. 2018Query-Efficient Hard-label Black-box Attack:An Optimization-based Approachcited by 130
  6. 2018Structured Adversarial Attack: Towards General Implementation and Better Interpretabilitycited by 63
  7. 2017Houdini: Fooling Deep Structured Prediction Modelscited by 50
  8. 2015Evasion and Hardening of Tree Ensemble Classifierscited by 44
  9. 2019Robust Decision Trees Against Adversarial Examplescited by 40
  10. 2021Modeling Realistic Adversarial Attacks against Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 39
  11. 2021Grey-box Adversarial Attack And Defence For Sentiment Classificationcited by 28
  12. 2020Efficient Training of Robust Decision Trees Against Adversarial Examplescited by 24
  13. 2020Black-box Adversarial Sample Generation Based on Differential Evolutioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 3.

13 papers.

Sort: