mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Robustness to Adversarial Image Obfuscations

arXiv 2301.12993 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated content filtering and moderation is an important tool that allows online platforms to build striving user communities that facilitate cooperation and prevent abuse. Unfortunately, resourceful actors try to bypass automated filters in a bid to post content that violate platform policies and codes of conduct. To reach this goal, these malicious actors may obfuscate policy violating images (e.g. overlay harmful images by carefully selected benign images or visual patterns) to prevent machine learning models from reaching the correct decision. In this paper, we invite researchers to tackle this specific issue and present a new image benchmark. This benchmark, based on ImageNet, simulates the type of obfuscations created by malicious actors. It goes beyond ImageNet-textrmC and ImageNet-bartextrmC by proposing general, drastic, adversarial modifications that preserve the original content intent. It aims to tackle a more common adversarial threat than the one considered by ℓp-norm bounded adversaries. We evaluate 33 pretrained models on the benchmark and train models with different augmentations, architectures and training methods on subsets of the obfuscations to measure generalization. We hope this benchmark will encourage researchers to test their models and methods and try to find new approaches that are more robust to these obfuscations.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2023.

Builds on

62 of 79 references.

References · 62

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  7. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  8. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  9. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  10. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  11. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  12. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
38 more
  1. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  2. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  3. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  4. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  5. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  6. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  7. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  8. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  9. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  10. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  11. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  12. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  13. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  14. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  15. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,194
  16. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  17. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  18. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  19. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  20. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
  21. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
  22. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  23. 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 656
  24. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
  25. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  26. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  27. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
  28. 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
  29. 2020Are we done with ImageNet?cited by 329
  30. 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 328
  31. 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
  32. 2021A Fine-Grained Analysis on Distribution Shiftcited by 171
  33. 2021On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examplescited by 167
  34. 20223D Common Corruptions and Data Augmentationcited by 120
  35. 2018LaVAN: Localized and Visible Adversarial Noisecited by 112
  36. 2021On Interaction Between Augmentations and Corruptions in Natural Corruption Robustnesscited by 98
  37. 2017Exploring the structure of a real-time, arbitrary neural artistic stylization networkcited by 89
  38. 2021On the effectiveness of adversarial training against common corruptionscited by 71

50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 1.

8 papers.