DODEM: DOuble DEfense Mechanism Against Adversarial Attacks Towards Secure Industrial Internet of Things Analytics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Industrial Internet of Things (I-IoT) is a collaboration of devices, sensors, and networking equipment to monitor and collect data from industrial operations. Machine learning (ML) methods use this data to make high-level decisions with minimal human intervention. Data-driven predictive maintenance (PDM) is a crucial ML-based I-IoT application to find an optimal maintenance schedule for industrial assets. The performance of these ML methods can seriously be threatened by adversarial attacks where an adversary crafts perturbed data and sends it to the ML model to deteriorate its prediction performance. The models should be able to stay robust against these attacks where robustness is measured by how much perturbation in input data affects model performance. Hence, there is a need for effective defense mechanisms that can protect these models against adversarial attacks. In this work, we propose a double defense mechanism to detect and mitigate adversarial attacks in I-IoT environments. We first detect if there is an adversarial attack on a given sample using novelty detection algorithms. Then, based on the outcome of our algorithm, marking an instance as attack or normal, we select adversarial retraining or standard training to provide a secondary defense layer. If there is an attack, adversarial retraining provides a more robust model, while we apply standard training for regular samples. Since we may not know if an attack will take place, our adaptive mechanism allows us to consider irregular changes in data. The results show that our double defense strategy is highly efficient where we can improve model robustness by up to 64.6% and 52% compared to standard and adversarial retraining, respectively.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2023.
Builds on
23 of 61 references.
References · 23
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
- 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 305
- 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
11 more
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
- 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 131
- 2020Boosting Adversarial Training with Hypersphere Embeddingcited by 97
- 2018CommanderSong: A Systematic Approach for Practical Adversarial Voice Recognitioncited by 63
- 2020CAT: Customized Adversarial Training for Improved Robustnesscited by 61
- 2019Adversarial Attacks on Deep Neural Networks for Time Series Classificationcited by 53
- 2020Crafting Adversarial Examples for Deep Learning Based Prognostics (Extended Version)cited by 9
- 2019Defense Methods Against Adversarial Examples for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 8
- 2022RES-HD: Resilient Intelligent Fault Diagnosis Against Adversarial Attacks Using Hyper-Dimensional Computingcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.