mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Provable Unrestricted Adversarial Training without Compromise with Generalizability

arXiv 2301.09069 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2023cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial training (AT) is widely considered as the most promising strategy to defend against adversarial attacks and has drawn increasing interest from researchers. However, the existing AT methods still suffer from two challenges. First, they are unable to handle unrestricted adversarial examples (UAEs), which are built from scratch, as opposed to restricted adversarial examples (RAEs), which are created by adding perturbations bound by an lp norm to observed examples. Second, the existing AT methods often achieve adversarial robustness at the expense of standard generalizability (i.e., the accuracy on natural examples) because they make a tradeoff between them. To overcome these challenges, we propose a unique viewpoint that understands UAEs as imperceptibly perturbed unobserved examples. Also, we find that the tradeoff results from the separation of the distributions of adversarial examples and natural examples. Based on these ideas, we propose a novel AT approach called Provable Unrestricted Adversarial Training (PUAT), which can provide a target classifier with comprehensive adversarial robustness against both UAE and RAE, and simultaneously improve its standard generalizability. Particularly, PUAT utilizes partially labeled data to achieve effective UAE generation by accurately capturing the natural data distribution through a novel augmented triple-GAN. At the same time, PUAT extends the traditional AT by introducing the supervised loss of the target classifier into the adversarial loss and achieves the alignment between the UAE distribution, the natural data distribution, and the distribution learned by the classifier, with the collaboration of the augmented triple-GAN. Finally, the solid theoretical analysis and extensive experiments conducted on widely-used benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of PUAT.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2023.

Builds on

44 of 72 references.

References · 44

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  5. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  6. 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 3,045
  7. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  8. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,636
  9. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  10. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  11. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
  12. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
32 more
  1. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  2. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
  3. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
  4. 2016Conditional Image Synthesis With Auxiliary Classifier GANscited by 565
  5. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
  6. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
  7. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 377
  8. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 279
  9. 2018Generating Adversarial Examples with Adversarial Networkscited by 258
  10. 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 234
  11. 2017Geometric GANcited by 233
  12. 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 204
  13. 2018Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalizationcited by 172
  14. 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 163
  15. 2018Constructing Unrestricted Adversarial Examples with Generative Modelscited by 135
  16. 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
  17. 2019Defense Against Adversarial Attacks Using Feature Scattering-based Adversarial Trainingcited by 95
  18. 2019ColorFool: Semantic Adversarial Colorizationcited by 89
  19. 2018Universal Adversarial Trainingcited by 87
  20. 2019Unrestricted Adversarial Examples via Semantic Manipulationcited by 84
  21. 2019Towards Large yet Imperceptible Adversarial Image Perturbations with Perceptual Color Distancecited by 73
  22. 2020CAT: Customized Adversarial Training for Improved Robustnesscited by 61
  23. 2017Triple Generative Adversarial Netscited by 60
  24. 2018Bilateral Adversarial Training: Towards Fast Training of More Robust Models Against Adversarial Attackscited by 48
  25. 2019Robust Local Features for Improving the Generalization of Adversarial Trainingcited by 30
  26. 2020On the Generalization Properties of Adversarial Trainingcited by 23
  27. 2018Improved Generalization Bounds for Adversarially Robust Learningcited by 22
  28. 2017Generative Adversarial Trainer: Defense to Adversarial Perturbations with GANcited by 20
  29. 2022Understanding Adversarial Robustness Against On-manifold Adversarial Examplescited by 12
  30. 2019Triple Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 11
  31. 2019Fine-grained Synthesis of Unrestricted Adversarial Examplescited by 8
  32. 2021Generating Unrestricted Adversarial Examples via Three Parameterscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.