mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Generalization Properties of Adversarial Training

arXiv 2008.06631 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2020stat.ML cs.LGcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern machine learning and deep learning models are shown to be vulnerable when testing data are slightly perturbed. Existing theoretical studies of adversarial training algorithms mostly focus on either adversarial training losses or local convergence properties. In contrast, this paper studies the generalization performance of a generic adversarial training algorithm. Specifically, we consider linear regression models and two-layer neural networks (with lazy training) using squared loss under low-dimensional and high-dimensional regimes. In the former regime, after overcoming the non-smoothness of adversarial training, the adversarial risk of the trained models can converge to the minimal adversarial risk. In the latter regime, we discover that data interpolation prevents the adversarially robust estimator from being consistent. Therefore, inspired by successes of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), we incorporate the L1 penalty in the high dimensional adversarial learning and show that it leads to consistent adversarially robust estimation. A series of numerical studies are conducted to demonstrate how the smoothness and L1 penalization help improve the adversarial robustness of DNN models.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 12; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 2.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
  2. 2022Stability Analysis and Generalization Bounds of Adversarial Trainingcited by 30
  3. 2022Overparameterized Linear Regression under Adversarial Attackscited by 21
  4. 2022Adversarial Rademacher Complexity of Deep Neural Networkscited by 18
  5. 2023Regularization properties of adversarially-trained linear regressioncited by 17
  6. 2022Instance-Dependent Generalization Bounds via Optimal Transportcited by 13
  7. 2022On the Role of Generalization in Transferability of Adversarial Examplescited by 9
  8. 2022Adaptive Smoothness-weighted Adversarial Training for Multiple Perturbations with Its Stability Analysiscited by 9
  9. 2023Provable Unrestricted Adversarial Training without Compromise with Generalizabilitycited by 6
  10. 2024Efficient Optimization Algorithms for Linear Adversarial Trainingcited by 6
  11. 2023PAD: Towards Principled Adversarial Malware Detection Against Evasion Attackscited by 5
  12. 2022Unlabeled Data Help: Minimax Analysis and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 4
11 more
  1. 2022Boosting Factorization Machines via Saliency-Guided Mixupcited by 3
  2. 2022AdAUC: End-to-end Adversarial AUC Optimization Against Long-tail Problemscited by 3
  3. 2022Surprises in adversarially-trained linear regressioncited by 2
  4. 2025AdvSumm: Adversarial Training for Bias Mitigation in Text Summarizationcited by 2
  5. 2022Semi-Implicit Hybrid Gradient Methods with Application to Adversarial Robustnesscited by 1
  6. 2022A Theoretical Study of The Effects of Adversarial Attacks on Sparse Regressioncited by 1
  7. 2024Asymptotic Behavior of Adversarial Training Estimator under ℓ_∞-Perturbationcited by 1
  8. 2024Better Representations via Adversarial Training in Pre-Training: A Theoretical Perspectivecited by 0
  9. 2024Generalization Properties of Adversarial Training for ℓ0-Bounded Adversarial Attackscited by 0
  10. 2024Optimizing Privacy and Utility Tradeoffs for Group Interests Through Harmonizationcited by 0
  11. 2025Ensuring Calibration Robustness in Split Conformal Prediction Under Adversarial Attackscited by 0