Deep Simplex Classifier for Maximizing the Margin in Both Euclidean and Angular Spaces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The classification loss functions used in deep neural network classifiers can be grouped into two categories based on maximizing the margin in either Euclidean or angular spaces. Euclidean distances between sample vectors are used during classification for the methods maximizing the margin in Euclidean spaces whereas the Cosine similarity distance is used during the testing stage for the methods maximizing margin in the angular spaces. This paper introduces a novel classification loss that maximizes the margin in both the Euclidean and angular spaces at the same time. This way, the Euclidean and Cosine distances will produce similar and consistent results and complement each other, which will in turn improve the accuracies. The proposed loss function enforces the samples of classes to cluster around the centers that represent them. The centers approximating classes are chosen from the boundary of a hypersphere, and the pairwise distances between class centers are always equivalent. This restriction corresponds to choosing centers from the vertices of a regular simplex. There is not any hyperparameter that must be set by the user in the proposed loss function, therefore the use of the proposed method is extremely easy for classical classification problems. Moreover, since the class samples are compactly clustered around their corresponding means, the proposed classifier is also very suitable for open set recognition problems where test samples can come from the unknown classes that are not seen in the training phase. Experimental studies show that the proposed method achieves the state-of-the-art accuracies on open set recognition despite its simplicity.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2022.
Builds on
23 of 52 references.
References · 23
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
- 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 971
- 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 737
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
- 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 624
- 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 538
- 2014Deep metric learning using Triplet networkcited by 422
- 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 310
- 2016Large-Margin Softmax Loss for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 296
- 2017Cross-Age LFW: A Database for Studying Cross-Age Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environmentscited by 260
11 more
- 2018Reducing Network Agnostophobiacited by 165
- 2018Classification-Reconstruction Learning for Open-Set Recognitioncited by 146
- 2019C2AE: Class Conditioned Auto-Encoder for Open-set Recognitioncited by 142
- 2020Learning Open Set Network with Discriminative Reciprocal Pointscited by 115
- 2016Range Loss for Deep Face Recognition with Long-tailcited by 111
- 2018Learning towards Minimum Hyperspherical Energycited by 75
- 2021Learning with Hyperspherical Uniformitycited by 35
- 2019A Theoretically Sound Upper Bound on the Triplet Loss for Improving the Efficiency of Deep Distance Metric Learningcited by 25
- 2019Regularizing Neural Networks via Minimizing Hyperspherical Energycited by 25
- 2017Contrastive-center loss for deep neural networkscited by 20
- 2021Deep Compact Polyhedral Conic Classifier for Open and Closed Set Recognitioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.