mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Curiosity creates Diversity in Policy Search

arXiv 2212.03530 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2022cs.NE cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When searching for policies, reward-sparse environments often lack sufficient information about which behaviors to improve upon or avoid. In such environments, the policy search process is bound to blindly search for reward-yielding transitions and no early reward can bias this search in one direction or another. A way to overcome this is to use intrinsic motivation in order to explore new transitions until a reward is found. In this work, we use a recently proposed definition of intrinsic motivation, Curiosity, in an evolutionary policy search method. We propose Curiosity-ES, an evolutionary strategy adapted to use Curiosity as a fitness metric. We compare Curiosity with Novelty, a commonly used diversity metric, and find that Curiosity can generate higher diversity over full episodes without the need for an explicit diversity criterion and lead to multiple policies which find reward.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2022.

Builds on

30 of 48 references.

References · 30

  1. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  2. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,598
  3. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
  4. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
  5. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 966
  6. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  7. 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 734
  8. 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 555
  9. 2017Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 516
  10. 2016Variational Intrinsic Controlcited by 262
  11. 2020First return, then explorecited by 256
  12. 2020Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategiescited by 210
18 more
  1. 2019Go-Explore: a New Approach for Hard-Exploration Problemscited by 207
  2. 2014Robots that can adapt like animalscited by 203
  3. 2017Improving Exploration in Evolution Strategies for Deep Reinforcement Learning via a Population of Novelty-Seeking Agentscited by 107
  4. 2019A survey on intrinsic motivation in reinforcement learningcited by 79
  5. 2019Covariance Matrix Adaptation for the Rapid Illumination of Behavior Spacecited by 78
  6. 2019Adaptive Stress Testing for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 70
  7. 2020Quality-Diversity Optimization: a novel branch of stochastic optimizationcited by 59
  8. 2019Autonomous skill discovery with Quality-Diversity and Unsupervised Descriptorscited by 57
  9. 2021Adversarially Guided Actor-Criticcited by 47
  10. 2017EX2: Exploration with Exemplar Models for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 42
  11. 2022EvoJAX: Hardware-Accelerated Neuroevolutioncited by 29
  12. 2018Back to Basics: Benchmarking Canonical Evolution Strategies for Playing Ataricited by 26
  13. 2020Meta-learning curiosity algorithmscited by 25
  14. 2019Unsupervised Learning and Exploration of Reachable Outcome Spacecited by 23
  15. 2022Combining Evolution and Deep Reinforcement Learning for Policy Search: a Surveycited by 20
  16. 2021Sparse Reward Exploration via Novelty Search and Emitterscited by 13
  17. 2018PNS: Population-Guided Novelty Search for Reinforcement Learning in Hard Exploration Environmentscited by 6
  18. 2021ARCH-Elites: Quality-Diversity for Urban Designcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.