mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Distinctive Image Captioning: Leveraging Ground Truth Captions in CLIP Guided Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2402.13936 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2024cs.CL cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training image captioning models using teacher forcing results in very generic samples, whereas more distinctive captions can be very useful in retrieval applications or to produce alternative texts describing images for accessibility. Reinforcement Learning (RL) allows to use cross-modal retrieval similarity score between the generated caption and the input image as reward to guide the training, leading to more distinctive captions. Recent studies show that pre-trained cross-modal retrieval models can be used to provide this reward, completely eliminating the need for reference captions. However, we argue in this paper that Ground Truth (GT) captions can still be useful in this RL framework. We propose a new image captioning model training strategy that makes use of GT captions in different ways. Firstly, they can be used to train a simple MLP discriminator that serves as a regularization to prevent reward hacking and ensures the fluency of generated captions, resulting in a textual GAN setup extended for multimodal inputs. Secondly, they can serve as additional trajectories in the RL strategy, resulting in a teacher forcing loss weighted by the similarity of the GT to the image. This objective acts as an additional learning signal grounded to the distribution of the GT captions. Thirdly, they can serve as strong baselines when added to the pool of captions used to compute the proposed contrastive reward to reduce the variance of gradient estimate. Experiments on MS-COCO demonstrate the interest of the proposed training strategy to produce highly distinctive captions while maintaining high writing quality.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2024.

Builds on

28 of 42 references.

References · 28

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  4. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  5. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
  6. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
  7. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
  8. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
  9. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 968
  10. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 824
  11. 2022OFA: Unifying Architectures, Tasks, and Modalities Through a Simple Sequence-to-Sequence Learning Frameworkcited by 745
  12. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
16 more
  1. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 547
  2. 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
  3. 2016SeqGAN: Sequence Generative Adversarial Nets with Policy Gradientcited by 376
  4. 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 365
  5. 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 233
  6. 2021Scaling Up Vision-Language Pre-training for Image Captioningcited by 196
  7. 2021Decoupled Contrastive Learningcited by 143
  8. 2019On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 82
  9. 2022Fine-grained Image Captioning with CLIP Rewardcited by 69
  10. 2018Discriminability objective for training descriptive captionscited by 67
  11. 2017Towards Diverse and Natural Image Descriptions via a Conditional GANcited by 59
  12. 2017Contrastive Learning for Image Captioningcited by 54
  13. 2019Describing like humans: on diversity in image captioningcited by 46
  14. 2022Multimodal Knowledge Alignment with Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  15. 2022Distinctive Image Captioning via CLIP Guided Group Optimizationcited by 6
  16. 2022Switching to Discriminative Image Captioning by Relieving a Bottleneck of Reinforcement Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025CapRL: Stimulating Dense Image Caption Capabilities via Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026CapRL++: Unified Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards for Dense Image and Video Captioning
  3. 2026CCCaption: Dual-Reward Reinforcement Learning for Complete and Correct Image Captioning
  4. 2026BalCapRL: A Balanced Framework for RL-Based MLLM Image Captioning
  5. 2026Re3Cap: Retrieval-Guided Refinement for Image Captioning Enhancement via Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026RubiCap: Rubric-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Dense Image Captioning
  7. 2022Prompt-based Learning for Unpaired Image Captioning
  8. 2024VLRM: Vision-Language Models act as Reward Models for Image Captioning