mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Solving Bongard Problems with a Visual Language and Pragmatic Reasoning

arXiv 1804.04452 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2018stat.ML cs.AI cs.LGcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

More than 50 years ago Bongard introduced 100 visual concept learning problems as a testbed for intelligent vision systems. These problems are now known as Bongard problems. Although they are well known in the cognitive science and AI communities only moderate progress has been made towards building systems that can solve a substantial subset of them. In the system presented here, visual features are extracted through image processing and then translated into a symbolic visual vocabulary. We introduce a formal language that allows representing complex visual concepts based on this vocabulary. Using this language and Bayesian inference, complex visual concepts can be induced from the examples that are provided in each Bongard problem. Contrary to other concept learning problems the examples from which concepts are induced are not random in Bongard problems, instead they are carefully chosen to communicate the concept, hence requiring pragmatic reasoning. Taking pragmatic reasoning into account we find good agreement between the concepts with high posterior probability and the solutions formulated by Bongard himself. While this approach is far from solving all Bongard problems, it solves the biggest fraction yet.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 5; 2024: 7; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Abstraction and Analogy-Making in Artificial Intelligencecited by 103
  2. 2022VASR: Visual Analogies of Situation Recognitioncited by 22
  3. 2023MEWL: Few-shot multimodal word learning with referential uncertaintycited by 17
  4. 2024Bongard in Wonderland: Visual Puzzles that Still Make AI Go Mad?cited by 16
  5. 2024Reasoning Limitations of Multimodal Large Language Models. A Case Study of Bongard Problemscited by 15
  6. 2024Neural networks for abstraction and reasoning: Towards broad generalization in machinescited by 13
  7. 2023Are Deep Neural Networks Adequate Behavioural Models of Human Visual Perception?cited by 10
  8. 2022Multi-Viewpoint and Multi-Evaluation with Felicitous Inductive Bias Boost Machine Abstract Reasoning Abilitycited by 7
  9. 2024Budgeted Online Continual Learning by Adaptive Layer Freezing and Frequency-based Samplingcited by 7
  10. 2025Bongard-RWR+: Real-World Representations of Fine-Grained Concepts in Bongard Problemscited by 7
  11. 2025Benchmarking World-Model Learning with Environment-Level Queriescited by 7
  12. 2021Using Program Synthesis and Inductive Logic Programming to solve Bongard Problemscited by 6
9 more
  1. 2022Geoclidean: Few-Shot Generalization in Euclidean Geometrycited by 6
  2. 2022Towards a Solution to Bongard Problems: A Causal Approachcited by 4
  3. 2023Im-Promptu: In-Context Composition from Image Promptscited by 4
  4. 2023Who's the Best Detective? LLMs vs. MLs in Detecting Incoherent Fourth Grade Math Answerscited by 3
  5. 2023Support-Set Context Matters for Bongard Problemscited by 3
  6. 2024Triple-CFN: Separating Concepts and Features Enhances Machine Abstract Reasoning Abilitycited by 2
  7. 2024Funny-Valen-Tine: Planning Solution Distribution Enhances Machine Abstract Reasoning Abilitycited by 1
  8. 2024D4C: Improving Negative Example Quality to Enhance Machine Abstract Reasoning Abilitycited by 0
  9. 2026Towards a universal language of concepts: A surveycited by 0