Learning Sampling Distributions Using Local 3D Workspace Decompositions for Motion Planning in High Dimensions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Earlier work has shown that reusing experience from prior motion planning problems can improve the efficiency of similar, future motion planning queries. However, for robots with many degrees-of-freedom, these methods exhibit poor generalization across different environments and often require large datasets that are impractical to gather. We present SPARK and FLAME , two experience-based frameworks for sampling-based planning applicable to complex manipulators in 3 D environments. Both combine samplers associated with features from a workspace decomposition into a global biased sampling distribution. SPARK decomposes the environment based on exact geometry while FLAME is more general, and uses an octree-based decomposition obtained from sensor data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of SPARK and FLAME on a Fetch robot tasked with challenging pick-and-place manipulation problems. Our approaches can be trained incrementally and significantly improve performance with only a handful of examples, generalizing better over diverse tasks and environments as compared to prior approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2022Motion Policy Networkscited by 53
- 2022Learning Implicit Priors for Motion Optimizationcited by 20
- 2021Motion Planning Transformers: A Motion Planning Framework for Mobile Robotscited by 10
- 2023Learning Sampling Dictionaries for Efficient and Generalizable Robot Motion Planning with Transformerscited by 7
- 2025Deep Reactive Policy: Learning Reactive Manipulator Motion Planning for Dynamic Environmentscited by 7
- 2022A Survey on the Integration of Machine Learning with Sampling-based Motion Planningcited by 6
- 2025Cascaded Diffusion Models for Neural Motion Planningcited by 4
- 2022Using Deep Learning to Bootstrap Abstractions for Hierarchical Robot Planningcited by 2
- 2024A Framework for Guided Motion Planningcited by 1
- 2024CoverLib: Classifiers-equipped Experience Library by Iterative Problem Distribution Coverage Maximization for Domain-tuned Motion Planningcited by 1
- 2026Toward Generalist Neural Motion Planners for Robotic Manipulators: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 1
- 2025Path Database Guidance for Motion Planningcited by 0
- 2026Toward Generalist Neural Motion Planners for Robotic Manipulators: Challenges and Opportunities25 Mar 2026
- 2025Deep Reactive Policy: Learning Reactive Manipulator Motion Planning for Dynamic Environments8 Sep 2025
- 2025Cascaded Diffusion Models for Neural Motion Planning21 May 2025
- 2025Path Database Guidance for Motion Planning7 Apr 2025
- 2024CoverLib: Classifiers-equipped Experience Library by Iterative Problem Distribution Coverage Maximization for Domain-tuned Motion Planning5 May 2024
- 2024A Framework for Guided Motion Planning4 Apr 2024
- 2023Learning Sampling Dictionaries for Efficient and Generalizable Robot Motion Planning with Transformers1 Jun 2023
- 2022A Survey on the Integration of Machine Learning with Sampling-based Motion Planning15 Nov 2022
- 2022Motion Policy Networks21 Oct 2022
- 2022Learning Implicit Priors for Motion Optimization11 Apr 2022
- 2022Using Deep Learning to Bootstrap Abstractions for Hierarchical Robot Planning2 Feb 2022
- 2021Motion Planning Transformers: A Motion Planning Framework for Mobile Robots5 Jun 2021