mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dialect-robust Evaluation of Generated Text

arXiv 2211.00922 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2022cs.CLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluation metrics that are not robust to dialect variation make it impossible to tell how well systems perform for many groups of users, and can even penalize systems for producing text in lower-resource dialects. However, currently, there exists no way to quantify how metrics respond to change in the dialect of a generated utterance. We thus formalize dialect robustness and dialect awareness as goals for NLG evaluation metrics. We introduce a suite of methods and corresponding statistical tests one can use to assess metrics in light of the two goals. Applying the suite to current state-of-the-art metrics, we demonstrate that they are not dialect-robust and that semantic perturbations frequently lead to smaller decreases in a metric than the introduction of dialect features. As a first step to overcome this limitation, we propose a training schema, NANO, which introduces regional and language information to the pretraining process of a metric. We demonstrate that NANO provides a size-efficient way for models to improve the dialect robustness while simultaneously improving their performance on the standard metric benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2022.

Builds on

24 of 55 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  4. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
  5. 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
  6. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  7. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  8. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
  9. 2020Evaluation of Text Generation: A Surveycited by 275
  10. 2016Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American Englishcited by 194
  11. 2022Scaling Up Models and Data with textttt5x and textttseqiocited by 187
  12. 2022Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Textcited by 154
12 more
  1. 2020Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation in Many Languages via Zero-Shot Paraphrasingcited by 114
  2. 2020Rethinking embedding coupling in pre-trained language modelscited by 103
  3. 2021Learning Compact Metrics for MTcited by 93
  4. 2022VALUE: Understanding Dialect Disparity in NLUcited by 45
  5. 2021SD-QA: Spoken Dialectal Question Answering for the Real Worldcited by 36
  6. 2017Replicability Analysis for Natural Language Processing: Testing Significance with Multiple Datasetscited by 32
  7. 2020Learning to Recognize Dialect Featurescited by 29
  8. 2022FRMT: A Benchmark for Few-Shot Region-Aware Machine Translationcited by 18
  9. 2018A Fast, Compact, Accurate Model for Language Identification of Codemixed Textcited by 11
  10. 2021Finding Variants for Construction-Based Dialectometry: A Corpus-Based Approach to Regional CxGscited by 11
  11. 2017Natural Language Processing with Small Feed-Forward Networkscited by 10
  12. 2022Corpus-Guided Contrast Sets for Morphosyntactic Feature Detection in Low-Resource English Varietiescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: