mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Variation is the Norm: Embracing Sociolinguistics in NLP

arXiv 2603.24222 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In Natural Language Processing (NLP), variation is typically seen as noise and "normalised away" before processing, even though it is an integral part of language. Conversely, studying language variation in social contexts is central to sociolinguistics. We present a framework to combine the sociolinguistic dimension of language with the technical dimension of NLP. We argue that by embracing sociolinguistics, variation can actively be included in a research setup, in turn informing the NLP side. To illustrate this, we provide a case study on Luxembourgish, an evolving language featuring a large amount of orthographic variation, demonstrating how NLP performance is impacted. The results show large discrepancies in the performance of models tested and fine-tuned on data with a large amount of orthographic variation in comparison to data closer to the (orthographic) standard. Furthermore, we provide a possible solution to improve the performance by including variation in the fine-tuning process. This case study highlights the importance of including variation in the research setup, as models are currently not robust to occurring variation. Our framework facilitates the inclusion of variation in the thought-process while also being grounded in the theoretical framework of sociolinguistics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2026.

Builds on

19 of 67 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  3. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  4. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,818
  5. 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,090
  6. 2020A Survey on Recent Approaches for Natural Language Processing in Low-Resource Scenarioscited by 171
  7. 2025Seq vs Seq: An Open Suite of Paired Encoders and Decoderscited by 38
  8. 2016What to do about non-standard (or non-canonical) language in NLPcited by 35
  9. 2021DaN+: Danish Nested Named Entities and Lexical Normalizationcited by 19
  10. 2023Does Manipulating Tokenization Aid Cross-Lingual Transfer? A Study on POS Tagging for Non-Standardized Languagescited by 19
  11. 2022Dialect-robust Evaluation of Generated Textcited by 14
  12. 2025Tokenization is Sensitive to Language Variationcited by 13
7 more
  1. 2025Data Quality Issues in Multilingual Speech Datasets: The Need for Sociolinguistic Awareness and Proactive Language Planningcited by 11
  2. 2020Lexical Normalization for Code-switched Data and its Effect on POS-taggingcited by 7
  3. 2023Measuring the Instability of Fine-Tuningcited by 7
  4. 2024Text Generation Models for Luxembourgish with Limited Data: A Balanced Multilingual Strategycited by 7
  5. 2024Neural Text Normalization for Luxembourgish using Real-Life Variation Datacited by 6
  6. 2025Beyond Weaponization: NLP Security for Medium and Lower-Resourced Languages in Their Own Rightcited by 2
  7. 2024Impoverished Language Technology: The Lack of (Social) Class in NLPcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.