ProVe: A Pipeline for Automated Provenance Verification of Knowledge Graphs against Textual Sources
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Knowledge Graphs are repositories of information that gather data from a multitude of domains and sources in the form of semantic triples, serving as a source of structured data for various crucial applications in the modern web landscape, from Wikipedia infoboxes to search engines. Such graphs mainly serve as secondary sources of information and depend on well-documented and verifiable provenance to ensure their trustworthiness and usability. However, their ability to systematically assess and assure the quality of this provenance, most crucially whether it properly supports the graph's information, relies mainly on manual processes that do not scale with size. ProVe aims at remedying this, consisting of a pipelined approach that automatically verifies whether a Knowledge Graph triple is supported by text extracted from its documented provenance. ProVe is intended to assist information curators and consists of four main steps involving rule-based methods and machine learning models: text extraction, triple verbalisation, sentence selection, and claim verification. ProVe is evaluated on a Wikidata dataset, achieving promising results overall and excellent performance on the binary classification task of detecting support from provenance, with 87.5% accuracy and 82.9% F1-macro on text-rich sources. The evaluation data and scripts used in this paper are available on GitHub and Figshare.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2022.
Builds on
30 of 74 references.
References · 30
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
- 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 869
- 2020A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applicationscited by 643
- 2020Knowledge Graphscited by 619
- 2020Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 383
- 2021A Survey on Automated Fact-Checkingcited by 376
- 2016FastText.zip: Compressing text classification modelscited by 331
- 2021Get Your Vitamin C! Robust Fact Verification with Contrastive Evidencecited by 222
- 2020Investigating Pretrained Language Models for Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 117
- 2018The Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) Shared Taskcited by 108
18 more
- 2019Fine-grained Fact Verification with Kernel Graph Attention Networkcited by 105
- 2019GEAR: Graph-based Evidence Aggregating and Reasoning for Fact Verificationcited by 100
- 2018Automated Fact Checking: Task formulations, methods and future directionscited by 96
- 2019Reasoning Over Semantic-Level Graph for Fact Checkingcited by 69
- 2018UKP-Athene: Multi-Sentence Textual Entailment for Claim Verificationcited by 60
- 2019BERT for Evidence Retrieval and Claim Verificationcited by 57
- 2021Automated Fact-Checking: A Surveycited by 55
- 2020Where Are the Facts? Searching for Fact-checked Information to Alleviate the Spread of Fake Newscited by 48
- 2021A Study of the Quality of Wikidatacited by 35
- 2015Discriminative Predicate Path Mining for Fact Checking in Knowledge Graphscited by 23
- 2017Finding Streams in Knowledge Graphs to Support Fact Checkingcited by 17
- 2018Quality Control in Crowdsourcing: A Survey of Quality Attributes, Assessment Techniques and Assurance Actionscited by 16
- 2019Team Papelo: Transformer Networks at FEVERcited by 11
- 2020Boilerplate Removal using a Neural Sequence Labeling Modelcited by 11
- 2018Web2Text: Deep Structured Boilerplate Removalcited by 10
- 2021Assessing the quality of sources in Wikidata across languages: a hybrid approachcited by 5
- 2022WDV: A Broad Data Verbalisation Dataset Built from Wikidatacited by 4
- 2022Visualizing and Explaining Language Modelscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025From Documents to Dialogue: Building KG-RAG Enhanced AI Assistantscited by 3
- 2026Evaluation of Pipelines for Data Integration into Knowledge Graphscited by 1
- 2024Evaluating Class Membership Relations in Knowledge Graphs using Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Schema-Aware Planning and Hybrid Knowledge Toolset for Reliable Knowledge Graph Triple Verificationcited by 0
- 2026Validating FKG.in: Soundness Assessment in LLM-Augmented Indian Food Knowledgecited by 0
- 2026Validating FKG.in: Soundness Assessment in LLM-Augmented Indian Food Knowledge29 Aug 2026
- 2026Evaluation of Pipelines for Data Integration into Knowledge Graphs21 May 2026
- 2026Schema-Aware Planning and Hybrid Knowledge Toolset for Reliable Knowledge Graph Triple Verification5 Apr 2026
- 2025From Documents to Dialogue: Building KG-RAG Enhanced AI Assistants21 Feb 2025
- 2024Evaluating Class Membership Relations in Knowledge Graphs using Large Language Models25 Apr 2024