Quantifying U-Net Uncertainty in Multi-Parametric MRI-based Glioma Segmentation by Spherical Image Projection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The projection of planar MRI data onto a spherical surface is equivalent to a nonlinear image transformation that retains global anatomical information. By incorporating this image transformation process in our proposed spherical projection-based U-Net (SPU-Net) segmentation model design, multiple independent segmentation predictions can be obtained from a single MRI. The final segmentation is the average of all available results, and the variation can be visualized as a pixel-wise uncertainty map. An uncertainty score was introduced to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measurements. The proposed SPU-Net model was implemented on the basis of 369 glioma patients with MP-MRI scans (T1, T1-Ce, T2, and FLAIR). Three SPU-Net models were trained to segment enhancing tumor (ET), tumor core (TC), and whole tumor (WT), respectively. The SPU-Net model was compared with (1) the classic U-Net model with test-time augmentation (TTA) and (2) linear scaling-based U-Net (LSU-Net) segmentation models in terms of both segmentation accuracy (Dice coefficient, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) and segmentation uncertainty (uncertainty map and uncertainty score). The developed SPU-Net model successfully achieved low uncertainty for correct segmentation predictions (e.g., tumor interior or healthy tissue interior) and high uncertainty for incorrect results (e.g., tumor boundaries). This model could allow the identification of missed tumor targets or segmentation errors in U-Net. Quantitatively, the SPU-Net model achieved the highest uncertainty scores for three segmentation targets (ET/TC/WT): 0.826/0.848/0.936, compared to 0.784/0.643/0.872 using the U-Net with TTA and 0.743/0.702/0.876 with the LSU-Net (scaling factor = 2). The SPU-Net also achieved statistically significantly higher Dice coefficients, underscoring the improved segmentation accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2022.
Builds on
24 of 47 references.
References · 24
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,525
- 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,435
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2017Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 553
- 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 280
- 2017Large Kernel Matters -- Improve Semantic Segmentation by Global Convolutional Networkcited by 208
- 2019MultiResUNet : Rethinking the U-Net Architecture for Multimodal Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 195
- 2020U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: theory and applicationscited by 169
12 more
- 2018Exploring Uncertainty Measures in Deep Networks for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection and Segmentationcited by 146
- 2018On the Effect of Inter-observer Variability for a Reliable Estimation of Uncertainty of Medical Image Segmentationcited by 46
- 2021Is segmentation uncertainty useful?cited by 37
- 2018Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation using Convolutional Neural Networks with Test-Time Augmentationcited by 36
- 2017A deep learning model integrating FCNNs and CRFs for brain tumor segmentationcited by 35
- 2020Deep Learning Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Surveycited by 30
- 2021QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Resultscited by 28
- 2019RF-Net: An End-to-End Image Matching Network based on Receptive Fieldcited by 22
- 2020Brain tumor segmentation with self-ensembled, deeply-supervised 3D U-net neural networks: a BraTS 2020 challenge solutioncited by 20
- 2019Open Set Recognition Through Deep Neural Network Uncertainty: Does Out-of-Distribution Detection Require Generative Classifiers?cited by 13
- 2018Large Receptive Field Networks for High-Scale Image Super-Resolutioncited by 5
- 2022A Neural Ordinary Differential Equation Model for Visualizing Deep Neural Network Behaviors in Multi-Parametric MRI based Glioma Segmentationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023A Radiomics-Incorporated Deep Ensemble Learning Model for Multi-Parametric MRI-based Glioma Segmentationcited by 4
- 2023Brain Tumor Segmentation Based on Deep Learning, Attention Mechanisms, and Energy-Based Uncertainty Predictioncited by 2
- 2025Enhancing Neuro-Oncology Through Self-Assessing Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumor Unified Model for MRI Segmentationcited by 0
- 2025Enhancing Neuro-Oncology Through Self-Assessing Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumor Unified Model for MRI Segmentation16 Nov 2025
- 2023Brain Tumor Segmentation Based on Deep Learning, Attention Mechanisms, and Energy-Based Uncertainty Prediction31 Dec 2023
- 2023A Radiomics-Incorporated Deep Ensemble Learning Model for Multi-Parametric MRI-based Glioma Segmentation19 Mar 2023