mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stateful active facilitator: Coordination and Environmental Heterogeneity in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2210.03022 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2022cs.AI cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning, a team of agents works together to achieve a common goal. Different environments or tasks may require varying degrees of coordination among agents in order to achieve the goal in an optimal way. The nature of coordination will depend on the properties of the environment -- its spatial layout, distribution of obstacles, dynamics, etc. We term this variation of properties within an environment as heterogeneity. Existing literature has not sufficiently addressed the fact that different environments may have different levels of heterogeneity. We formalize the notions of coordination level and heterogeneity level of an environment and present HECOGrid, a suite of multi-agent RL environments that facilitates empirical evaluation of different MARL approaches across different levels of coordination and environmental heterogeneity by providing a quantitative control over coordination and heterogeneity levels of the environment. Further, we propose a Centralized Training Decentralized Execution learning approach called Stateful Active Facilitator (SAF) that enables agents to work efficiently in high-coordination and high-heterogeneity environments through a differentiable and shared knowledge source used during training and dynamic selection from a shared pool of policies. We evaluate SAF and compare its performance against baselines IPPO and MAPPO on HECOGrid. Our results show that SAF consistently outperforms the baselines across different tasks and different heterogeneity and coordination levels. We release the code for HECOGrid as well as all our experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2022.

Builds on

41 of 63 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
  4. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  5. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  6. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
  7. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
  8. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,042
  9. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  10. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  11. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  12. 2021Perceiver IO: A General Architecture for Structured Inputs & Outputscited by 616
29 more
  1. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  2. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
  3. 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 490
  4. 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 355
  5. 2018Neural Relational Inference for Interacting Systemscited by 339
  6. 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 281
  7. 2017StarCraft II: A New Challenge for Reinforcement Learningcited by 268
  8. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
  9. 2019Recurrent Independent Mechanismscited by 219
  10. 2018TarMAC: Targeted Multi-Agent Communicationcited by 201
  11. 2019MAVEN: Multi-Agent Variational Explorationcited by 181
  12. 2021Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
  13. 2018Learning Attentional Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperationcited by 170
  14. 2021Scalable Evaluation of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Melting Potcited by 97
  15. 2021Celebrating Diversity in Shared Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
  16. 2021Scaling Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Selective Parameter Sharingcited by 85
  17. 2021Coordination Among Neural Modules Through a Shared Global Workspacecited by 83
  18. 2021Neural Production Systems: Learning Rule-Governed Visual Dynamicscited by 75
  19. 2017MAgent: A Many-Agent Reinforcement Learning Platform for Artificial Collective Intelligencecited by 69
  20. 2013Hidden Parameter Markov Decision Processes: A Semiparametric Regression Approach for Discovering Latent Task Parametrizationscited by 68
  21. 2022Federated Reinforcement Learning with Environment Heterogeneitycited by 61
  22. 2021ToM2C: Target-oriented Multi-agent Communication and Cooperation with Theory of Mindcited by 57
  23. 2020Object Files and Schemata: Factorizing Declarative and Procedural Knowledge in Dynamical Systemscited by 48
  24. 2020Emergent Social Learning via Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
  25. 2021Discrete-Valued Neural Communicationcited by 39
  26. 2021On the Approximation of Cooperative Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) using Mean Field Control (MFC)cited by 31
  27. 2022FedKL: Tackling Data Heterogeneity in Federated Reinforcement Learning by Penalizing KL Divergencecited by 29
  28. 2021Dynamic Inference with Neural Interpreterscited by 24
  29. 2020A Maximum Mutual Information Framework for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

10 papers.