mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

InterFace:Adjustable Angular Margin Inter-class Loss for Deep Face Recognition

arXiv 2210.02018 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2022cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the field of face recognition, it is always a hot research topic to improve the loss solution to make the face features extracted by the network have greater discriminative power. Research works in recent years has improved the discriminative power of the face model by normalizing softmax to the cosine space step by step and then adding a fixed penalty margin to reduce the intra-class distance to increase the inter-class distance. Although a great deal of previous work has been done to optimize the boundary penalty to improve the discriminative power of the model, adding a fixed margin penalty to the depth feature and the corresponding weight is not consistent with the pattern of data in the real scenario. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose a novel loss function, InterFace, releasing the constraint of adding a margin penalty only between the depth feature and the corresponding weight to push the separability of classes by adding corresponding margin penalties between the depth features and all weights. To illustrate the advantages of InterFace over a fixed penalty margin, we explained geometrically and comparisons on a set of mainstream benchmarks. From a wider perspective, our InterFace has advanced the state-of-the-art face recognition performance on five out of thirteen mainstream benchmarks. All training codes, pre-trained models, and training logs, are publicly released footnotehttps://github.com/iamsangmeng/InterFace.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2022.

Builds on

18 of 30 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  3. 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 968
  4. 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 911
  5. 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 733
  6. 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 621
  7. 2014Learning Face Representation from Scratchcited by 451
  8. 2020Circle Loss: A Unified Perspective of Pair Similarity Optimizationcited by 402
  9. 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 332
  10. 2020CurricularFace: Adaptive Curriculum Learning Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 320
  11. 2016Large-Margin Softmax Loss for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 296
  12. 2017Cross-Age LFW: A Database for Studying Cross-Age Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environmentscited by 258
6 more
  1. 2015The MegaFace Benchmark: 1 Million Faces for Recognition at Scalecited by 199
  2. 2020Partial FC: Training 10 Million Identities on a Single Machinecited by 163
  3. 2021ElasticFace: Elastic Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 143
  4. 2015A Light CNN for Deep Face Representation with Noisy Labelscited by 126
  5. 2019AdaCos: Adaptively Scaling Cosine Logits for Effectively Learning Deep Face Representationscited by 83
  6. 2020GroupFace: Learning Latent Groups and Constructing Group-based Representations for Face Recognitioncited by 38

Built on by

Not cited yet.