Risk-graded Safety for Handling Medical Queries in Conversational AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conversational AI systems can engage in unsafe behaviour when handling users' medical queries that can have severe consequences and could even lead to deaths. Systems therefore need to be capable of both recognising the seriousness of medical inputs and producing responses with appropriate levels of risk. We create a corpus of human written English language medical queries and the responses of different types of systems. We label these with both crowdsourced and expert annotations. While individual crowdworkers may be unreliable at grading the seriousness of the prompts, their aggregated labels tend to agree with professional opinion to a greater extent on identifying the medical queries and recognising the risk types posed by the responses. Results of classification experiments suggest that, while these tasks can be automated, caution should be exercised, as errors can potentially be very serious.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2022.
Builds on
16 of 41 references.
References · 16
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,220
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
- 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
- 2020The Pushshift Reddit Datasetcited by 292
- 2020SLURP: A Spoken Language Understanding Resource Packagecited by 198
- 2019Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attackcited by 176
- 2020Recipes for Safety in Open-domain Chatbotscited by 170
- 2019Benchmarking Natural Language Understanding Services for building Conversational Agentscited by 166
- 2020MedDialog: Two Large-scale Medical Dialogue Datasetscited by 161
- 2021Anticipating Safety Issues in E2E Conversational AI: Framework and Toolingcited by 78
4 more
- 2021On the Safety of Conversational Models: Taxonomy, Dataset, and Benchmarkcited by 73
- 2018RankME: Reliable Human Ratings for Natural Language Generationcited by 69
- 2021Beyond Fair Pay: Ethical Implications of NLP Crowdsourcingcited by 53
- 2021ConvAbuse: Data, Analysis, and Benchmarks for Nuanced Abuse Detection in Conversational AIcited by 46
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2024LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Taskscited by 243
- 2023Sociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systemscited by 157
- 2023Mirages: On Anthropomorphism in Dialogue Systemscited by 30
- 2024NLP Verification: Towards a General Methodology for Certifying Robustnesscited by 16
- 2023ASSERT: Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2022Foveate, Attribute, and Rationalize: Towards Physically Safe and Trustworthy AIcited by 5
- 2023Fillers in Spoken Language Understanding: Computational and Psycholinguistic Perspectivescited by 5
- 2025Aligning Black-box Language Models with Human Judgmentscited by 1
- 2025A Typology of Synthetic Datasets for Dialogue Processing in Clinical Contextscited by 1
- 2026Food Noise & False Safety: A Systematic Evaluation of How LLMs Fail to Adapt to Eating Disorder Queries with Clinician Feedbackcited by 1
- 2026ECHO: A Locally-Deployable Agentic Health Assistant with Temporal Memory, Safety Guardrails, and Speech Assessmentcited by 0
- 2026ECHO: A Locally-Deployable Agentic Health Assistant with Temporal Memory, Safety Guardrails, and Speech Assessment6 Aug 2026
- 2026Food Noise & False Safety: A Systematic Evaluation of How LLMs Fail to Adapt to Eating Disorder Queries with Clinician Feedback1 Jun 2026
- 2025A Typology of Synthetic Datasets for Dialogue Processing in Clinical Contexts5 May 2025
- 2025Aligning Black-box Language Models with Human Judgments7 Feb 2025
- 2024LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Tasks26 Jun 2024
- 2024NLP Verification: Towards a General Methodology for Certifying Robustness15 Mar 2024
- 2023Sociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systems18 Oct 2023
- 2023ASSERT: Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models14 Oct 2023
- 2023Mirages: On Anthropomorphism in Dialogue Systems16 May 2023
- 2023Fillers in Spoken Language Understanding: Computational and Psycholinguistic Perspectives25 Jan 2023
- 2022Foveate, Attribute, and Rationalize: Towards Physically Safe and Trustworthy AI19 Dec 2022