mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparsity-Constrained Optimal Transport

arXiv 2209.15466 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2022stat.ML cs.LGcited by 32

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Regularized optimal transport (OT) is now increasingly used as a loss or as a matching layer in neural networks. Entropy-regularized OT can be computed using the Sinkhorn algorithm but it leads to fully-dense transportation plans, meaning that all sources are (fractionally) matched with all targets. To address this issue, several works have investigated quadratic regularization instead. This regularization preserves sparsity and leads to unconstrained and smooth (semi) dual objectives, that can be solved with off-the-shelf gradient methods. Unfortunately, quadratic regularization does not give direct control over the cardinality (number of nonzeros) of the transportation plan. We propose in this paper a new approach for OT with explicit cardinality constraints on the transportation plan. Our work is motivated by an application to sparse mixture of experts, where OT can be used to match input tokens such as image patches with expert models such as neural networks. Cardinality constraints ensure that at most k tokens are matched with an expert, which is crucial for computational performance reasons. Despite the nonconvexity of cardinality constraints, we show that the corresponding (semi) dual problems are tractable and can be solved with first-order gradient methods. Our method can be thought as a middle ground between unregularized OT (recovered in the limit case k=1) and quadratically-regularized OT (recovered when k is large enough). The smoothness of the objectives increases as k increases, giving rise to a trade-off between convergence speed and sparsity of the optimal plan.

Key facts. Cited by 32 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2022.

Builds on

31 of 59 references.

References · 31

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  4. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  5. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
  6. 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,601
  7. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,437
  8. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
  9. 2021Scaling Vision with Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 740
  10. 2021BASE Layers: Simplifying Training of Large, Sparse Modelscited by 315
  11. 2022Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Modelscited by 249
  12. 2021Hash Layers For Large Sparse Modelscited by 236
19 more
  1. 2022Multimodal Contrastive Learning with LIMoE: the Language-Image Mixture of Expertscited by 202
  2. 2022A Review of Sparse Expert Models in Deep Learningcited by 147
  3. 2021Sinkformers: Transformers with Doubly Stochastic Attentioncited by 136
  4. 2019Learning with Fenchel-Young Lossescited by 117
  5. 2017Smooth and Sparse Optimal Transportcited by 83
  6. 2015Top-k Multiclass SVMcited by 28
  7. 2022Meta Optimal Transportcited by 28
  8. 2021SpeechMoE2: Mixture-of-Experts Model with Improved Routingcited by 26
  9. 2016Regularized Optimal Transport and the Rot Mover's Distancecited by 24
  10. 2019Differentiable Deep Clustering with Cluster Size Constraintscited by 21
  11. 2020Efficient Marginalization of Discrete and Structured Latent Variables via Sparsitycited by 21
  12. 2022TPU-KNN: K Nearest Neighbor Search at Peak FLOP/scited by 18
  13. 2019Quadratically regularized optimal transportcited by 15
  14. 2016Convergence of a Newton algorithm for semi-discrete optimal transportcited by 13
  15. 2021Unbiased Gradient Estimation with Balanced Assignments for Mixtures of Expertscited by 10
  16. 2015New Perspectives on k-Support and Cluster Normscited by 9
  17. 2019A Smoother Way to Train Structured Prediction Modelscited by 9
  18. 2020Wasserstein k-means with sparse simplex projectioncited by 6
  19. 2017Gini-regularized Optimal Transport with an Application to Spatio-Temporal Forecastingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 8; 2024: 7; 2025: 9; 2026: 8.

32 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023From Sparse to Soft Mixtures of Expertscited by 245
  2. 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 58
  3. 2023Fast, Differentiable and Sparse Top-k: a Convex Analysis Perspectivecited by 26
  4. 2024Routers in Vision Mixture of Experts: An Empirical Studycited by 22
  5. 2023Monge, Bregman and Occam: Interpretable Optimal Transport in High-Dimensions with Feature-Sparse Mapscited by 16
  6. 2023Accurate Neural Network Pruning Requires Rethinking Sparse Optimizationcited by 10
  7. 2023Structured Transforms Across Spaces with Cost-Regularized Optimal Transportcited by 8
  8. 2025Tight Clusters Make Specialized Expertscited by 8
  9. 2024Many-Objective Multi-Solution Transportcited by 5
  10. 2024Submodular Framework for Structured-Sparse Optimal Transportcited by 4
  11. 2025Plasticity-Aware Mixture of Experts for Learning Under QoE Shifts in Adaptive Video Streamingcited by 4
  12. 2025Improving Routing in Sparse Mixture of Experts with Graph of Tokenscited by 4
20 more
  1. 2023Bringing regularized optimal transport to lightspeed: a splitting method adapted for GPUscited by 3
  2. 2023Optimal Transport with Tempered Exponential Measurescited by 3
  3. 2024Unleashing the Power of Meta-tuning for Few-shot Generalization Through Sparse Interpolated Expertscited by 3
  4. 2024A Riemannian Approach to Ground Metric Learning for Optimal Transportcited by 3
  5. 2025Modeling Expert Interactions in Sparse Mixture of Experts via Graph Structurescited by 3
  6. 2026SoftMoE: Soft Differentiable Routing for Mixture-of-Experts in LLMscited by 3
  7. 2024When Graph Neural Networks Meet Dynamic Mode Decompositioncited by 2
  8. 2026Sliced-Regularized Optimal Transportcited by 2
  9. 2025Displacement-Sparse Neural Optimal Transportcited by 1
  10. 2025Sparse Partial Optimal Transport via Quadratic Regularizationcited by 1
  11. 2025Selective Sinkhorn Routing for Improved Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 1
  12. 2023High-Rate Phase Association with Travel Time Neural Fieldscited by 0
  13. 2024Sparse Domain Transfer via Elastic Net Regularizationcited by 0
  14. 2025Many-to-Many Matching via Sparsity Controlled Optimal Transportcited by 0
  15. 2026Optimal Transport under Group Fairness Constraintscited by 0
  16. 2026Multi-Domain Learning with Global Expert Mappingcited by 0
  17. 2026HMR-Net: Hierarchical Modular Routing for Cross-Domain Object Detection in Aerial Imagescited by 0
  18. 2026Take It or Leave It: Intent-Controlled Partial Optimal Transportcited by 0
  19. 2026SinkSLOT: Sinkhorn via Sparse Lifted Optimal Transportcited by 0
  20. 2026Optimal transport meets speech: a tutorial reviewcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Rectified Flow: A Marginal Preserving Approach to Optimal Transport
  2. 2025On the Relation between Rectified Flows and Optimal Transport
  3. 2025COFM: Consistent Optimal Transport Flow Matching via Partially Input Convex Neural Networks
  4. 2021Score-based Generative Neural Networks for Large-Scale Optimal Transport
  5. 2025Offline Reinforcement Learning with Wasserstein Regularization via Optimal Transport Maps
  6. 2026Preconditioned Flow Matching
  7. 2025Differentiable Entropy Regularization: A Complexity-Aware Approach for Neural Optimization
  8. 2026Expected Batch Optimal Transport Plans and Consequences for Flow Matching