mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

COFM: Consistent Optimal Transport Flow Matching via Partially Input Convex Neural Networks

arXiv 2511.06042 ↗First posted 8 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Optimal transport (OT) provides a principled framework for learning mappings between probability distributions, and has found broad applications in generative modeling, inverse problems and scientific computing. Recently, flow matching methods have emerged as an efficient paradigm for learning continuous-time transport dynamics. However, existing OT-based flow matching methods often suffer from either high computational cost due to inner optimization or limited consistency. Moreover, it remains challenging to design neural architectures that can simultaneously guarantee convexity, stability, and efficient transport learning. In this paper, we propose a framework for consistent optimal transport flow matching. Specifically, we parameterize the transport potential using partially input convex neural networks (PICNN), and incorporate a Hamilton-Jacobi residual into the training objective to enforce dynamical consistency of the learned flow. This design enables a unified formulation that supports both one-step transport and multi-step ODE-based sampling, without requiring costly inner optimization. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves competitive performance compared with existing OT-based and flow matching approaches, while maintaining favorable computational efficiency. In particular, under the D=256 benchmark, COFM achieves more than a 2x reduction in L^2-UVP compared with state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, while requiring approximately 9x less computational time. These results suggest that combining convex potential structures with HJ-based dynamical regularization provides an effective framework for scalable and geometrically consistent transport learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 33 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2025.

Builds on

33 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Discrete Flow Matching22 Jul
  2. 2024Consistency Flow Matching: Defining Straight Flows with Velocity Consistency2 Jul
  3. 2024Optimal Flow Matching: Learning Straight Trajectories in Just One Step19 Mar
  4. 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport1 Feb
  5. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
  6. 2022Rectified Flow: A Marginal Preserving Approach to Optimal Transport29 Sep
  7. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep

Other references · 26

  1. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  2. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
  3. 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
  4. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  5. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  6. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  7. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
  8. 2022Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,114
  9. 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 678
  10. 2021Diffusion Schr"odinger Bridge with Applications to Score-Based Generative Modelingcited by 602
  11. 2017The Deep Ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problemscited by 583
  12. 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 561
14 more
  1. 2017Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learningcited by 556
  2. 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 414
  3. 2019Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networkscited by 206
  4. 2020Adversarial Latent Autoencoderscited by 155
  5. 2020OT-Flow: Fast and Accurate Continuous Normalizing Flows via Optimal Transportcited by 143
  6. 2014On the relation between optimal transport and Schr"odinger bridges: A stochastic control viewpointcited by 99
  7. 2019Wasserstein-2 Generative Networkscited by 97
  8. 2021Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 Benchmarkcited by 96
  9. 2024Light and Optimal Schr"odinger Bridge Matchingcited by 45
  10. 2019Adaptive Deep Learning for High-Dimensional Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equationscited by 40
  11. 2021Neural Monge Map estimation and its applicationscited by 40
  12. 2021Wasserstein GANs Work Because They Fail (to Approximate the Wasserstein Distance)cited by 35
  13. 2021DeepParticle: learning invariant measure by a deep neural network minimizing Wasserstein distance on data generated from an interacting particle methodcited by 9
  14. 2025DPOT: A DeepParticle method for Computation of Optimal Transport with convergence guaranteecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026VTV-FM: Flow Matching through Variational Terminal-Velocity Closure
  2. 2025Beyond Optimal Transport: Model-Aligned Coupling for Flow Matching
  3. 2026Multimarginal flow matching with optimal transport potentials
  4. 2026Flow Matching from Viewpoint of Proximal Operators
  5. 2026ODE-free Neural Flow Matching for One-Step Generative Modeling
  6. 2026Smoother Flow Matching via Contrastive Trajectory Repulsion
  7. 2025On the Relation between Rectified Flows and Optimal Transport
  8. 2025On the Equivalence of Optimal Transport Problem and Action Matching with Optimal Vector Fields