Sparse Partial Optimal Transport via Quadratic Regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Partial Optimal Transport (POT) has recently emerged as a central tool in various Machine Learning (ML) applications. It lifts the stringent assumption of the conventional Optimal Transport (OT) that input measures are of equal masses, which is often not guaranteed in real-world datasets, and thus offers greater flexibility by permitting transport between unbalanced input measures. Nevertheless, existing major solvers for POT commonly rely on entropic regularization for acceleration and thus return dense transport plans, hindering the adoption of POT in various applications that favor sparsity. In this paper, as an alternative approach to the entropic POT formulation in the literature, we propose a novel formulation of POT with quadratic regularization, hence termed quadratic regularized POT (QPOT), which induces sparsity to the transport plan and consequently facilitates the adoption of POT in many applications with sparsity requirements. Extensive experiments on synthetic and CIFAR-10 datasets, as well as real-world applications such as color transfer and domain adaptations, consistently demonstrate the improved sparsity and favorable performance of our proposed QPOT formulation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2025.
Builds on
27 of 66 references.
References · 27
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
- 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 780
- 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 463
- 2018Computational Optimal Transport: Complexity by Accelerated Gradient Descent Is Better Than by Sinkhorn's Algorithmcited by 112
- 2018SGD and Hogwild! Convergence Without the Bounded Gradients Assumptioncited by 95
- 2017Smooth and Sparse Optimal Transportcited by 83
- 2018Optimal Transport for Multi-source Domain Adaptation under Target Shiftcited by 68
- 2024Clarabel: An interior-point solver for conic programs with quadratic objectivescited by 44
- 2017From optimal transport to generative modeling: the VEGAN cookbookcited by 41
- 2019On the Efficiency of Entropic Regularized Algorithms for Optimal Transportcited by 35
- 2022Sparsity-Constrained Optimal Transportcited by 32
- 2020Unpaired Deep Learning for Accelerated MRI using Optimal Transport Driven CycleGANcited by 28
15 more
- 2015Fast Optimal Transport Averaging of Neuroimaging Datacited by 26
- 2018Globally Convergent Type-I Anderson Acceleration for Non-Smooth Fixed-Point Iterationscited by 25
- 2020Optimal Transport for Conditional Domain Matching and Label Shiftcited by 20
- 2022On Unbalanced Optimal Transport: Gradient Methods, Sparsity and Approximation Errorcited by 16
- 2016Tsallis Regularized Optimal Transport and Ecological Inferencecited by 15
- 2019Quadratically regularized optimal transportcited by 15
- 2018Primal-dual accelerated gradient methods with small-dimensional relaxation oraclecited by 14
- 2016Decentralized Frank-Wolfe Algorithm for Convex and Non-convex Problemscited by 11
- 2019Entropic regularization of continuous optimal transport problemscited by 10
- 2023On Partial Optimal Transport: Revising the Infeasibility of Sinkhorn and Efficient Gradient Methodscited by 7
- 2023Correlated Attention in Transformers for Multivariate Time Seriescited by 6
- 2024Quadratically Regularized Optimal Transport: Existence and Multiplicity of Potentialscited by 3
- 2021Understanding the Scalability of Hyperledger Fabriccited by 2
- 2024Stochastic Constrained Decentralized Optimization for Machine Learning with Fewer Data Oracles: a Gradient Sliding Approachcited by 2
- 2023Coded Computing for Fault-Tolerant Parallel QR Decompositioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.