mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

USC: Uncompromising Spatial Constraints for Safety-Oriented 3D Object Detectors in Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2209.10368 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → VLMs for autonomous driving

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we consider the safety-oriented performance of 3D object detectors in autonomous driving contexts. Specifically, despite impressive results shown by the mass literature, developers often find it hard to ensure the safe deployment of these learning-based perception models. Attributing the challenge to the lack of safety-oriented metrics, we hereby present uncompromising spatial constraints (USC), which characterize a simple yet important localization requirement demanding the predictions to fully cover the objects when seen from the autonomous vehicle. The constraints, as we formulate using the perspective and bird's-eye views, can be naturally reflected by quantitative measures, such that having an object detector with a higher score implies a lower risk of collision. Finally, beyond model evaluation, we incorporate the quantitative measures into common loss functions to enable safety-oriented fine-tuning for existing models. With experiments using the nuScenes dataset and a closed-loop simulation, our work demonstrates such considerations of safety notions at the perception level not only improve model performances beyond accuracy but also allow for a more direct linkage to actual system safety.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLMs for autonomous driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2022.

Builds on

13 of 27 references.

References · 13

  1. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  2. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  3. 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,143
  4. 2020Accelerating 3D Deep Learning with PyTorch3Dcited by 781
  5. 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 528
  6. 2021FCOS3D: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 444
  7. 2021Probabilistic and Geometric Depth: Detecting Objects in Perspectivecited by 190
  8. 2020SSN: Shape Signature Networks for Multi-class Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 74
  9. 2019Deep Fitting Degree Scoring Network for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 67
  10. 2020Learning to Evaluate Perception Models Using Planner-Centric Metricscited by 49
  11. 2021Revisiting 3D Object Detection From an Egocentric Perspectivecited by 18
  12. 2020Safety-Aware Hardening of 3D Object Detection Neural Network Systemscited by 9
1 more
  1. 2022Unaligned but Safe -- Formally Compensating Performance Limitations for Imprecise 2D Object Detectioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Context-aware Risk Assessment and Its Application in Autonomous Driving
  2. 2022Calibrating Perception Uncertainty for Autonomous Driving
  3. 2025INSIGHT: Enhancing Autonomous Driving Safety through Vision-Language Models on Context-Aware Hazard Detection and Edge Case Evaluation
  4. 2026Localized Conformal Safety Monitoring with Vision-Language Models for Autonomous Driving
  5. 2024A Comprehensive Review of 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving: Technological Advances and Future Directions
  6. 2025Towards Benchmarking and Assessing the Safety and Robustness of Autonomous Driving on Safety-critical Scenarios
  7. 2026READ: Learning Risk-Informed Fields for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
  8. 2025Safety2Drive: Safety-Critical Scenario Benchmark for the Evaluation of Autonomous Driving