Conservative Dual Policy Optimization for Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Provably efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning (MBRL) based on optimism or posterior sampling (PSRL) is ensured to attain the global optimality asymptotically by introducing the complexity measure of the model. However, the complexity might grow exponentially for the simplest nonlinear models, where global convergence is impossible within finite iterations. When the model suffers a large generalization error, which is quantitatively measured by the model complexity, the uncertainty can be large. The sampled model that current policy is greedily optimized upon will thus be unsettled, resulting in aggressive policy updates and over-exploration. In this work, we propose Conservative Dual Policy Optimization (CDPO) that involves a Referential Update and a Conservative Update. The policy is first optimized under a reference model, which imitates the mechanism of PSRL while offering more stability. A conservative range of randomness is guaranteed by maximizing the expectation of model value. Without harmful sampling procedures, CDPO can still achieve the same regret as PSRL. More importantly, CDPO enjoys monotonic policy improvement and global optimality simultaneously. Empirical results also validate the exploration efficiency of CDPO.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2022.
Builds on
41 of 79 references.
References · 41
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,598
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
- 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 753
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 748
- 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 514
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
- 2018Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisationcited by 318
29 more
- 2016Contextual Decision Processes with Low Bellman Rank are PAC-Learnablecited by 290
- 2017Neural Network Dynamics for Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Model-Free Fine-Tuningcited by 288
- 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 253
- 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
- 2018Model-Ensemble Trust-Region Policy Optimizationcited by 214
- 2019Reinforcement Learning in Feature Space: Matrix Bandit, Kernels, and Regret Boundcited by 199
- 2021Bilinear Classes: A Structural Framework for Provable Generalization in RLcited by 176
- 2018Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Stochastic Ensemble Value Expansioncited by 167
- 2015Learning Continuous Control Policies by Stochastic Value Gradientscited by 156
- 2017Deep Exploration via Randomized Value Functionscited by 155
- 2018Model-Based Value Estimation for Efficient Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 152
- 2018Algorithmic Framework for Model-based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Theoretical Guaranteescited by 138
- 2014Model-based Reinforcement Learning and the Eluder Dimensioncited by 116
- 2016Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?cited by 116
- 2022Accelerated Policy Learning with Parallel Differentiable Simulationcited by 92
- 2019Exploring Model-based Planning with Policy Networkscited by 90
- 2020Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning through Optimistic Policy Search and Planningcited by 83
- 2022Do Differentiable Simulators Give Better Policy Gradients?cited by 83
- 2021Model-free Representation Learning and Exploration in Low-rank MDPscited by 82
- 2017The Uncertainty Bellman Equation and Explorationcited by 81
- 2017Ensemble Samplingcited by 62
- 2020Model-Augmented Actor-Critic: Backpropagating through Pathscited by 61
- 2018Satisficing in Time-Sensitive Bandit Learningcited by 38
- 2019On Online Learning in Kernelized Markov Decision Processescited by 32
- 2021Provable Model-based Nonlinear Bandit and Reinforcement Learning: Shelve Optimism, Embrace Virtual Curvaturecited by 32
- 2018Dual Policy Iterationcited by 22
- 2016Guided Policy Search as Approximate Mirror Descentcited by 14
- 2015Dual Control for Approximate Bayesian Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
- 2019Sample Complexity of Estimating the Policy Gradient for Nearly Deterministic Dynamical Systemscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Self-Exploring Language Models: Active Preference Elicitation for Online Alignmentcited by 63
- 2024How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approachcited by 13
- 2025Beyond Markovian: Reflective Exploration via Bayes-Adaptive RL for LLM Reasoningcited by 8
- 2023Model-Based Reparameterization Policy Gradient Methods: Theory and Practical Algorithmscited by 7
- 2023How to Fine-tune the Model: Unified Model Shift and Model Bias Policy Optimizationcited by 6
- 2025Beyond Markovian: Reflective Exploration via Bayes-Adaptive RL for LLM Reasoning26 May 2025
- 2024Self-Exploring Language Models: Active Preference Elicitation for Online Alignment29 May 2024
- 2024How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach25 Feb 2024
- 2023Model-Based Reparameterization Policy Gradient Methods: Theory and Practical Algorithms30 Oct 2023
- 2023How to Fine-tune the Model: Unified Model Shift and Model Bias Policy Optimization22 Sep 2023