mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MIXRTs: Toward Interpretable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Mixing Recurrent Soft Decision Trees

arXiv 2209.07225 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.MAcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While achieving tremendous success in various fields, existing multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) with a black-box neural network makes decisions in an opaque manner that hinders humans from understanding the learned knowledge and how input observations influence decisions. In contrast, existing interpretable approaches usually suffer from weak expressivity and low performance. To bridge this gap, we propose MIXing Recurrent soft decision Trees (MIXRTs), a novel interpretable architecture that can represent explicit decision processes via the root-to-leaf path and reflect each agent's contribution to the team. Specifically, we construct a novel soft decision tree using a recurrent structure and demonstrate which features influence the decision-making process. Then, based on the value decomposition framework, we linearly assign credit to each agent by explicitly mixing individual action values to estimate the joint action value using only local observations, providing new insights into interpreting the cooperation mechanism. Theoretical analysis confirms that MIXRTs guarantee additivity and monotonicity in the factorization of joint action values. Evaluations on complex tasks like Spread and StarCraft II demonstrate that MIXRTs compete with existing methods while providing clear explanations, paving the way for interpretable and high-performing MARL systems.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2022.

Builds on

30 of 65 references.

References · 30

  1. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  2. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  3. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  4. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  5. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
  6. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  7. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  8. 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 457
  9. 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 403
  10. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
  11. 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 364
  12. 2021MetaDrive: Composing Diverse Driving Scenarios for Generalizable Reinforcement Learningcited by 281
18 more
  1. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
  2. 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 230
  3. 2015Multiagent Cooperation and Competition with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
  4. 2020Explainable Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 139
  5. 2017Interpreting Deep Visual Representations via Network Dissectioncited by 103
  6. 2016Graying the black box: Understanding DQNscited by 68
  7. 2021Rethinking the Implementation Tricks and Monotonicity Constraint in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
  8. 2020The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computationcited by 57
  9. 2019Neural Logic Reinforcement Learningcited by 53
  10. 2021Iterative Bounding MDPs: Learning Interpretable Policies via Non-Interpretable Methodscited by 31
  11. 2019Conservative Q-Improvement: Reinforcement Learning for an Interpretable Decision-Tree Policycited by 29
  12. 2021Regularized Softmax Deep Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 19
  13. 2021Semantic Tracklets: An Object-Centric Representation for Visual Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
  14. 2018Interpretable Visual Question Answering by Reasoning on Dependency Treescited by 15
  15. 2020CDT: Cascading Decision Trees for Explainable Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  16. 2022POETREE: Interpretable Policy Learning with Adaptive Decision Treescited by 14
  17. 2021Temporal-Spatial Causal Interpretations for Vision-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  18. 2020Towards Improved and Interpretable Deep Metric Learning via Attentive Groupingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

10 papers.