mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Concept Learning for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2507.20143 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2025cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite substantial progress in applying neural networks (NN) to multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) areas, they still largely suffer from a lack of transparency and interoperability. However, its implicit cooperative mechanism is not yet fully understood due to black-box networks. In this work, we study an interpretable value decomposition framework via concept bottleneck models, which promote trustworthiness by conditioning credit assignment on an intermediate level of human-like cooperation concepts. To address this problem, we propose a novel value-based method, named Concepts learning for Multi-agent Q-learning (CMQ), that goes beyond the current performance-vs-interpretability trade-off by learning interpretable cooperation concepts. CMQ represents each cooperation concept as a supervised vector, as opposed to existing models where the information flowing through their end-to-end mechanism is concept-agnostic. Intuitively, using individual action value conditioning on global state embeddings to represent each concept allows for extra cooperation representation capacity. Empirical evaluations on the StarCraft II micromanagement challenge and level-based foraging (LBF) show that CMQ achieves superior performance compared with the state-of-the-art counterparts. The results also demonstrate that CMQ provides more cooperation concept representation capturing meaningful cooperation modes, and supports test-time concept interventions for detecting potential biases of cooperation mode and identifying spurious artifacts that impact cooperation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2025.

Builds on

21 of 28 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  2. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  3. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  4. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  5. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
  6. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
  7. 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
  8. 2018Verifiable Reinforcement Learning via Policy Extractioncited by 176
  9. 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
  10. 2020Shared Experience Actor-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
  11. 2021Celebrating Diversity in Shared Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
  12. 2020Qatten: A General Framework for Cooperative Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
9 more
  1. 2019Shapley Q-value: A Local Reward Approach to Solve Global Reward Gamescited by 71
  2. 2016Graying the black box: Understanding DQNscited by 68
  3. 2017Guided Deep Reinforcement Learning for Swarm Systemscited by 44
  4. 2021SHAQ: Incorporating Shapley Value Theory into Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 26
  5. 2021Interactive Disentanglement: Learning Concepts by Interacting with their Prototype Representationscited by 24
  6. 2020Q-value Path Decomposition for Deep Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
  7. 2022Concept Gradient: Concept-based Interpretation Without Linear Assumptioncited by 20
  8. 2023NA2Q: Neural Attention Additive Model for Interpretable Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 14
  9. 2022MIXRTs: Toward Interpretable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Mixing Recurrent Soft Decision Treescited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.