Learning Deep Optimal Embeddings with Sinkhorn Divergences
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Metric Learning algorithms aim to learn an efficient embedding space to preserve the similarity relationships among the input data. Whilst these algorithms have achieved significant performance gains across a wide plethora of tasks, they have also failed to consider and increase comprehensive similarity constraints; thus learning a sub-optimal metric in the embedding space. Moreover, up until now; there have been few studies with respect to their performance in the presence of noisy labels. Here, we address the concern of learning a discriminative deep embedding space by designing a novel, yet effective Deep Class-wise Discrepancy Loss (DCDL) function that segregates the underlying similarity distributions (thus introducing class-wise discrepancy) of the embedding points between each and every class. Our empirical results across three standard image classification datasets and two fine-grained image recognition datasets in the presence and absence of noise clearly demonstrate the need for incorporating such class-wise similarity relationships along with traditional algorithms while learning a discriminative embedding space.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2022.
Builds on
31 of 61 references.
References · 31
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
- 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 765
- 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
19 more
- 2017Learning Generative Models with Sinkhorn Divergencescited by 310
- 2017Sampling Matters in Deep Embedding Learningcited by 285
- 2017No Fuss Distance Metric Learning using Proxiescited by 225
- 2017VEEGAN: Reducing Mode Collapse in GANs using Implicit Variational Learningcited by 199
- 2019SoftTriple Loss: Deep Metric Learning Without Triplet Samplingcited by 163
- 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
- 2018Deep Metric Learning with Hierarchical Triplet Losscited by 112
- 2017Deep Metric Learning with Angular Losscited by 107
- 2018Revisiting Small Batch Training for Deep Neural Networkscited by 100
- 2013A Survey on Metric Learning for Feature Vectors and Structured Datacited by 57
- 2019Hardness-Aware Deep Metric Learningcited by 55
- 2016Learning Deep Embeddings with Histogram Losscited by 52
- 2019MIC: Mining Interclass Characteristics for Improved Metric Learningcited by 41
- 2018Deep Metric Learning with BIER: Boosting Independent Embeddings Robustlycited by 40
- 2019Divide and Conquer the Embedding Space for Metric Learningcited by 39
- 2016Gated Siamese Convolutional Neural Network Architecture for Human Re-Identificationcited by 34
- 2015Learning Local Image Descriptors with Deep Siamese and Triplet Convolutional Networks by Minimising Global Loss Functionscited by 33
- 2018On the Computational Inefficiency of Large Batch Sizes for Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 25
- 2017Significance of Softmax-based Features in Comparison to Distance Metric Learning-based Featurescited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.