mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Significance of Softmax-based Features in Comparison to Distance Metric Learning-based Features

arXiv 1712.10151 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2017cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The extraction of useful deep features is important for many computer vision tasks. Deep features extracted from classification networks have proved to perform well in those tasks. To obtain features of greater usefulness, end-to-end distance metric learning (DML) has been applied to train the feature extractor directly. However, in these DML studies, there were no equitable comparisons between features extracted from a DML-based network and those from a softmax-based network. In this paper, by presenting objective comparisons between these two approaches under the same network architecture, we show that the softmax-based features perform competitive, or even better, to the state-of-the-art DML features when the size of the dataset, that is, the number of training samples per class, is large. The results suggest that softmax-based features should be properly taken into account when evaluating the performance of deep features.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

8 papers.