mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TESTSGD: Interpretable Testing of Neural Networks Against Subtle Group Discrimination

arXiv 2208.11321 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2022cs.LG cs.CY cs.SEcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Discrimination has been shown in many machine learning applications, which calls for sufficient fairness testing before their deployment in ethic-relevant domains such as face recognition, medical diagnosis and criminal sentence. Existing fairness testing approaches are mostly designed for identifying individual discrimination, i.e., discrimination against individuals. Yet, as another widely concerning type of discrimination, testing against group discrimination, mostly hidden, is much less studied. To address the gap, in this work, we propose TESTSGD, an interpretable testing approach which systematically identifies and measures hidden (which we call `subtle' group discrimination} of a neural network characterized by conditions over combinations of the sensitive features. Specifically, given a neural network, TESTSGDfirst automatically generates an interpretable rule set which categorizes the input space into two groups exposing the model's group discrimination. Alongside, TESTSGDalso provides an estimated group fairness score based on sampling the input space to measure the degree of the identified subtle group discrimination, which is guaranteed to be accurate up to an error bound. We evaluate TESTSGDon multiple neural network models trained on popular datasets including both structured data and text data. The experiment results show that TESTSGDis effective and efficient in identifying and measuring such subtle group discrimination that has never been revealed before. Furthermore, we show that the testing results of TESTSGDcan guide generation of new samples to mitigate such discrimination through retraining with negligible accuracy drop.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2022.

Builds on

23 of 59 references.

References · 23

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  3. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,009
  4. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
  5. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  6. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
  7. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  8. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 311
  9. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 251
  10. 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 210
  11. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 168
  12. 2017Fairness Testing: Testing Software for Discriminationcited by 126
11 more
  1. 2018Automated Directed Fairness Testingcited by 78
  2. 2017Racial Disparity in Natural Language Processing: A Case Study of Social Media African-American Englishcited by 71
  3. 2020Learning Certified Individually Fair Representationscited by 69
  4. 2018Interpretable Adversarial Perturbation in Input Embedding Space for Textcited by 67
  5. 2016Scalable Bayesian Rule Listscited by 64
  6. 2020Do the Machine Learning Models on a Crowd Sourced Platform Exhibit Bias? An Empirical Study on Model Fairnesscited by 52
  7. 2020Justicia: A Stochastic SAT Approach to Formally Verify Fairnesscited by 25
  8. 2018Automated Test Generation to Detect Individual Discrimination in AI Modelscited by 21
  9. 2019A Research Agenda: Dynamic Models to Defend Against Correlated Attackscited by 18
  10. 2021Automatic Fairness Testing of Neural Classifiers through Adversarial Samplingcited by 14
  11. 2016Iterative Orthogonal Feature Projection for Diagnosing Bias in Black-Box Modelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.