FairRec: Fairness Testing for Deep Recommender Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning-based recommender systems (DRSs) are increasingly and widely deployed in the industry, which brings significant convenience to people's daily life in different ways. However, recommender systems are also shown to suffer from multiple issues,e.g., the echo chamber and the Matthew effect, of which the notation of "fairness" plays a core role.While many fairness notations and corresponding fairness testing approaches have been developed for traditional deep classification models, they are essentially hardly applicable to DRSs. One major difficulty is that there still lacks a systematic understanding and mapping between the existing fairness notations and the diverse testing requirements for deep recommender systems, not to mention further testing or debugging activities. To address the gap, we propose FairRec, a unified framework that supports fairness testing of DRSs from multiple customized perspectives, e.g., model utility, item diversity, item popularity, etc. We also propose a novel, efficient search-based testing approach to tackle the new challenge, i.e., double-ended discrete particle swarm optimization (DPSO) algorithm, to effectively search for hidden fairness issues in the form of certain disadvantaged groups from a vast number of candidate groups. Given the testing report, by adopting a simple re-ranking mitigation strategy on these identified disadvantaged groups, we show that the fairness of DRSs can be significantly improved. We conducted extensive experiments on multiple industry-level DRSs adopted by leading companies. The results confirm that FairRec is effective and efficient in identifying the deeply hidden fairness issues, e.g., achieving 95% testing accuracy with half to 1/8 time.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2023.
Builds on
28 of 58 references.
References · 28
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,111
- 2016Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 747
- 2019Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendationcited by 714
- 2017DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Predictioncited by 676
- 2017Deep Interest Network for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 544
- 2017Deep & Cross Network for Ad Click Predictionscited by 393
- 2020Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 240
- 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
- 2017Fairness Testing: Testing Software for Discriminationcited by 126
- 2019Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspectivecited by 123
- 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
16 more
- 2017Beyond Parity: Fairness Objectives for Collaborative Filteringcited by 93
- 2018Automated Directed Fairness Testingcited by 78
- 2021User-oriented Fairness in Recommendationcited by 75
- 2022Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trendscited by 62
- 2021Deconfounded Recommendation for Alleviating Bias Amplificationcited by 51
- 2020FairRec: Fairness-aware News Recommendation with Decomposed Adversarial Learningcited by 44
- 2021User-centered Evaluation of Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 38
- 2019Security and Privacy on Blockchaincited by 32
- 2019Feature Generation by Convolutional Neural Network for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 26
- 2021Testing Group Fairness via Optimal Transport Projectionscited by 23
- 2018User Fairness in Recommender Systemscited by 21
- 2019Multi-stakeholder Recommendation and its Connection to Multi-sided Fairnesscited by 19
- 2021Automatic Fairness Testing of Neural Classifiers through Adversarial Samplingcited by 14
- 2022Experiments on Generalizability of User-Oriented Fairness in Recommender Systemscited by 13
- 2022TESTSGD: Interpretable Testing of Neural Networks Against Subtle Group Discriminationcited by 7
- 2021A Pre-processing Method for Fairness in Rankingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.