Hierarchical Inference and Closure Learning via Adaptive Surrogates for ODEs and PDEs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Inverse problems are the task of calibrating models to match data. They play a pivotal role in diverse engineering applications by allowing practitioners to align models with reality. In many applications, engineers and scientists do not have a complete picture of i) the detailed properties of a system (such as material properties, geometry, initial conditions, etc.); ii) the complete laws describing all dynamics at play (such as friction laws, complicated damping phenomena, and general nonlinear interactions). In this paper, we develop a principled methodology for leveraging data from collections of distinct yet related physical systems to jointly estimate the individual model parameters of each system, and learn the shared unknown dynamics in the form of an ML-based closure model. To robustly infer the unknown parameters for each system, we employ a hierarchical Bayesian framework, which allows for the joint inference of multiple systems and their population-level statistics. To learn the closures, we use a maximum marginal likelihood estimate of a neural network embeded within the ODE/PDE formulation of the problem. To realize this framework we utilize the ensemble Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm (MALA) for stable and efficient sampling. To mitigate the computational bottleneck of repetitive forward evaluations in solving inverse problems, we introduce a bilevel optimization strategy to simultaneously train a surrogate forward model alongside the inference. Within this framework, we evaluate and compare distinct surrogate architectures, specifically Fourier Neural Operators (FNO) and parametric Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINNs).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.
Builds on
30 of 59 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 540
- 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 527
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 335
- 2020Weak SINDy For Partial Differential Equationscited by 155
- 2017A Review on Bilevel Optimization: From Classical to Evolutionary Approaches and Applicationscited by 129
- 2022Multifidelity deep neural operators for efficient learning of partial differential equations with application to fast inverse design of nanoscale heat transportcited by 92
- 2013A computational framework for infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems. Part I: The linearized case, with application to global seismic inversioncited by 32
- 2025PDE-Transformer: Efficient and Versatile Transformers for Physics Simulationscited by 32
18 more
- 2015Data Assimilation: A Mathematical Introductioncited by 27
- 2013A computational framework for infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems: Part II. Stochastic Newton MCMC with application to ice sheet flow inverse problemscited by 19
- 2023Interacting Particle Langevin Algorithm for Maximum Marginal Likelihood Estimationcited by 17
- 2025Sensitivity-Constrained Fourier Neural Operators for Forward and Inverse Problems in Parametric Differential Equationscited by 14
- 2022Deep Learning Closure Models for Large-Eddy Simulation of Flows around Bluff Bodiescited by 11
- 2024Efficient Prior Calibration From Indirect Datacited by 11
- 2024Physics-Informed Deep Inverse Operator Networks for Solving PDE Inverse Problemscited by 11
- 2023Gaussian processes for Bayesian inverse problems associated with linear partial differential equationscited by 9
- 2024BiLO: Bilevel Local Operator Learning for PDE Inverse Problemscited by 8
- 2022Learning-informed parameter identification in nonlinear time-dependent PDEscited by 7
- 2021A Latent Restoring Force Approach to Nonlinear System Identificationcited by 6
- 2024BINDy -- Bayesian identification of nonlinear dynamics with reversible-jump Markov-chain Monte-Carlocited by 6
- 2025Deep Operator Networks for Bayesian Parameter Estimation in PDEscited by 6
- 2019A deep surrogate approach to efficient Bayesian inversion in PDE and integral equation modelscited by 5
- 2025Efficient Deconvolution in Populational Inverse Problemscited by 4
- 2024A Primer on Variational Inference for Physics-Informed Deep Generative Modellingcited by 3
- 2025Bayesian BiLO: Bilevel Local Operator Learning for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification of Bayesian PDE Inverse Problems with Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 2
- 2024Bayesian grey-box identification of nonlinear convection effects in heat transfer dynamicscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.