mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparative analysis of machine learning methods for active flow control

arXiv 2202.11664 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2022physics.flu-dyn cs.LG cs.NEcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning frameworks such as Genetic Programming (GP) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) are gaining popularity in flow control. This work presents a comparative analysis of the two, bench-marking some of their most representative algorithms against global optimization techniques such as Bayesian Optimization (BO) and Lipschitz global optimization (LIPO). First, we review the general framework of the model-free control problem, bringing together all methods as black-box optimization problems. Then, we test the control algorithms on three test cases. These are (1) the stabilization of a nonlinear dynamical system featuring frequency cross-talk, (2) the wave cancellation from a Burgers' flow and (3) the drag reduction in a cylinder wake flow. We present a comprehensive comparison to illustrate their differences in exploration versus exploitation and their balance between `model capacity' in the control law definition versus `required complexity'. We believe that such a comparison paves the way toward the hybridization of the various methods, and we offer some perspective on their future development in the literature on flow control problems.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 150 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2022.

Builds on

24 of 150 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  4. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  5. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  6. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
  7. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
  8. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
  9. 2019A Survey of Reinforcement Learning Informed by Natural Languagecited by 154
  10. 2018A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Controlcited by 129
  11. 2014Dynamic mode decomposition with controlcited by 128
  12. 2019A Survey of Optimization Methods from a Machine Learning Perspectivecited by 90
12 more
  1. 2016Learning values across many orders of magnitudecited by 80
  2. 2018Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learningcited by 73
  3. 2019A review on Deep Reinforcement Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 65
  4. 2018Remember and Forget for Experience Replaycited by 42
  5. 2017Global optimization of Lipschitz functionscited by 39
  6. 2019Control of chaotic systems by Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
  7. 2020Controlling Rayleigh-B'enard convection via Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
  8. 2019Symbolic Regression Methods for Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
  9. 2016A statistical learning strategy for closed-loop control of fluid flowscited by 4
  10. 2020Reinforcement Learning via Gaussian Processes with Neural Network Dual Kernelscited by 3
  11. 2018Combining Bayesian Optimization and Lipschitz Optimizationcited by 2
  12. 2018Efficient Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Using Gaussian Processcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2.

6 papers.