mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Human Saliency-Driven Patch-based Matching for Interpretable Post-mortem Iris Recognition

arXiv 2208.03138 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2022cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Forensic iris recognition, as opposed to live iris recognition, is an emerging research area that leverages the discriminative power of iris biometrics to aid human examiners in their efforts to identify deceased persons. As a machine learning-based technique in a predominantly human-controlled task, forensic recognition serves as "back-up" to human expertise in the task of post-mortem identification. As such, the machine learning model must be (a) interpretable, and (b) post-mortem-specific, to account for changes in decaying eye tissue. In this work, we propose a method that satisfies both requirements, and that approaches the creation of a post-mortem-specific feature extractor in a novel way employing human perception. We first train a deep learning-based feature detector on post-mortem iris images, using annotations of image regions highlighted by humans as salient for their decision making. In effect, the method learns interpretable features directly from humans, rather than purely data-driven features. Second, regional iris codes (again, with human-driven filtering kernels) are used to pair detected iris patches, which are translated into pairwise, patch-based comparison scores. In this way, our method presents human examiners with human-understandable visual cues in order to justify the identification decision and corresponding confidence score. When tested on a dataset of post-mortem iris images collected from 259 deceased subjects, the proposed method places among the three best iris matchers, demonstrating better results than the commercial (non-human-interpretable) VeriEye approach. We propose a unique post-mortem iris recognition method trained with human saliency to give fully-interpretable comparison outcomes for use in the context of forensic examination, achieving state-of-the-art recognition performance.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2022.

Builds on

13 of 50 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019Post-mortem Iris Recognition with Deep-Learning-based Image Segmentationcited by 32
  3. 2018Domain-Specific Human-Inspired Binarized Statistical Image Features for Iris Recognitioncited by 24
  4. 2018Image Provenance Analysis at Scalecited by 16
  5. 2018Iris Recognition After Deathcited by 13
  6. 2018Performance of Humans in Iris Recognition: The Impact of Iris Condition and Annotation-driven Verificationcited by 11
  7. 2021Iris Recognition Based on SIFT Featurescited by 11
  8. 2017An Experimental Study of Deep Convolutional Features For Iris Recognitioncited by 10
  9. 2019ThirdEye: Triplet Based Iris Recognition without Normalizationcited by 8
  10. 2019Post-Mortem Iris Recognition Resistant to Biological Eye Decay Processescited by 8
  11. 2021Interpretable Deep Learning-Based Forensic Iris Segmentation and Recognitioncited by 8
  12. 2018Post-mortem Human Iris Recognitioncited by 4
1 more
  1. 2020Are Gabor Kernels Optimal for Iris Recognition?cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

11 papers.