mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Psych-Occlusion: Using Visual Psychophysics for Aerial Detection of Occluded Persons during Search and Rescue

arXiv 2412.05553 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The success of Emergency Response (ER) scenarios, such as search and rescue, is often dependent upon the prompt location of a lost or injured person. With the increasing use of small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) as "eyes in the sky" during ER scenarios, efficient detection of persons from aerial views plays a crucial role in achieving a successful mission outcome. Fatigue of human operators during prolonged ER missions, coupled with limited human resources, highlights the need for sUAS equipped with Computer Vision (CV) capabilities to aid in finding the person from aerial views. However, the performance of CV models onboard sUAS substantially degrades under real-life rigorous conditions of a typical ER scenario, where person search is hampered by occlusion and low target resolution. To address these challenges, we extracted images from the NOMAD dataset and performed a crowdsource experiment to collect behavioural measurements when humans were asked to "find the person in the picture". We exemplify the use of our behavioral dataset, Psych-ER, by using its human accuracy data to adapt the loss function of a detection model. We tested our loss adaptation on a RetinaNet model evaluated on NOMAD against increasing distance and occlusion, with our psychophysical loss adaptation showing improvements over the baseline at higher distances across different levels of occlusion, without degrading performance at closer distances. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first human-guided approach to address the location task of a detection model, while addressing real-world challenges of aerial search and rescue. All datasets and code can be found at: https://github.com/ArtRuss/NOMAD.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2024.

Builds on

41 of 105 references.

References · 41

  1. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  2. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,630
  3. 2019Objects as Pointscited by 1,175
  4. 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 982
  5. 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
  6. 2019CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object Detectioncited by 654
  7. 2023DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detectioncited by 533
  8. 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 531
  9. 2018Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Surveycited by 392
  10. 2021Towards Open World Object Detectioncited by 297
  11. 2014Towards Open World Recognitioncited by 226
  12. 2018The Limits and Potentials of Deep Learning for Roboticscited by 104
29 more
  1. 2022PP-YOLOE: An evolved version of YOLOcited by 75
  2. 2022PROB: Probabilistic Objectness for Open World Object Detectioncited by 57
  3. 2018Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Survey on Civil Applications and Key Research Challengescited by 54
  4. 2022Towards Open-Set Object Detection and Discoverycited by 44
  5. 2022UC-OWOD: Unknown-Classified Open World Object Detectioncited by 40
  6. 2021CYBORG: Blending Human Saliency Into the Loss Improves Deep Learningcited by 33
  7. 2021Human-Aided Saliency Maps Improve Generalization of Deep Learningcited by 27
  8. 2021Occlusion Handling in Generic Object Detection: A Reviewcited by 25
  9. 2018Domain-Specific Human-Inspired Binarized Statistical Image Features for Iris Recognitioncited by 24
  10. 2022The State of Aerial Surveillance: A Surveycited by 20
  11. 2018Visual Psychophysics for Making Face Recognition Algorithms More Explainablecited by 19
  12. 2016PsyPhy: A Psychophysics Driven Evaluation Framework for Visual Recognitioncited by 18
  13. 2019Robustness of Object Recognition under Extreme Occlusion in Humans and Computational Modelscited by 18
  14. 2017Using Human Brain Activity to Guide Machine Learningcited by 15
  15. 2021YOLO-ReT: Towards High Accuracy Real-time Object Detection on Edge GPUscited by 12
  16. 2018Performance of Humans in Iris Recognition: The Impact of Iris Condition and Annotation-driven Verificationcited by 11
  17. 2019Measuring Human Perception to Improve Handwritten Document Transcriptioncited by 11
  18. 2022Human Saliency-Driven Patch-based Matching for Interpretable Post-mortem Iris Recognitioncited by 11
  19. 2023WiSARD: A Labeled Visual and Thermal Image Dataset for Wilderness Search and Rescuecited by 9
  20. 2023Teaching AI to Teach: Leveraging Limited Human Salience Data Into Unlimited Saliency-Based Trainingcited by 8
  21. 2020The Next Generation of Human-Drone Partnerships: Co-Designing an Emergency Response Systemcited by 7
  22. 2022Extending MAPE-K to support Human-Machine Teamingcited by 7
  23. 2022Measuring Human Perception to Improve Open Set Recognitioncited by 7
  24. 2022Using Human Perception to Regularize Transfer Learningcited by 6
  25. 2021Adaptive Autonomy in Human-on-the-Loop Vision-Based Robotics Systemscited by 4
  26. 2023NOMAD: A Natural, Occluded, Multi-scale Aerial Dataset, for Emergency Response Scenarioscited by 4
  27. 2023Open Problems in Computer Vision for Wilderness SAR and The Search for Patricia Wu-Muradcited by 3
  28. 2022Human Activity Recognition in an Open Worldcited by 2
  29. 2023HIFuzz: Human Interaction Fuzzing for small Unmanned Aerial Vehiclescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.