Iris Recognition Based on SIFT Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Biometric methods based on iris images are believed to allow very high accuracy, and there has been an explosion of interest in iris biometrics in recent years. In this paper, we use the Scale Invariant Feature Transformation (SIFT) for recognition using iris images. Contrarily to traditional iris recognition systems, the SIFT approach does not rely on the transformation of the iris pattern to polar coordinates or on highly accurate segmentation, allowing less constrained image acquisition conditions. We extract characteristic SIFT feature points in scale space and perform matching based on the texture information around the feature points using the SIFT operator. Experiments are done using the BioSec multimodal database, which includes 3,200 iris images from 200 individuals acquired in two different sessions. We contribute with the analysis of the influence of different SIFT parameters on the recognition performance. We also show the complementarity between the SIFT approach and a popular matching approach based on transformation to polar coordinates and Log-Gabor wavelets. The combination of the two approaches achieves significantly better performance than either of the individual schemes, with a performance improvement of 24% in the Equal Error Rate.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2021.
Builds on
0 of 19 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 7; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
11 papers.
- 2022Human Saliency-Driven Patch-based Matching for Interpretable Post-mortem Iris Recognitioncited by 11
- 2022Iris super-resolution using CNNs: is photo-realism important to iris recognition?cited by 4
- 2024Combined CNN and ViT features off-the-shelf: Another astounding baseline for recognitioncited by 4
- 2023Exploring Deep Learning Image Super-Resolution for Iris Recognitioncited by 3
- 2022Compact multi-scale periocular recognition using SAFE featurescited by 2
- 2022Experimental analysis regarding the influence of iris segmentation on the recognition ratecited by 2
- 2022A Survey of Super-Resolution in Iris Biometrics with Evaluation of Dictionary-Learningcited by 1
- 2022Very Low-Resolution Iris Recognition Via Eigen-Patch Super-Resolution and Matcher Fusioncited by 0
- 2022Super-Resolution and Image Re-projection for Iris Recognitioncited by 0
- 2023Log-Likelihood Score Level Fusion for Improved Cross-Sensor Smartphone Periocular Recognitioncited by 0
- 2023Keypoint Description by Symmetry Assessment -- Applications in Biometricscited by 0
- 2024Combined CNN and ViT features off-the-shelf: Another astounding baseline for recognition28 Jul 2024
- 2023Keypoint Description by Symmetry Assessment -- Applications in Biometrics3 Nov 2023
- 2023Exploring Deep Learning Image Super-Resolution for Iris Recognition2 Nov 2023
- 2023Log-Likelihood Score Level Fusion for Improved Cross-Sensor Smartphone Periocular Recognition2 Nov 2023
- 2022Experimental analysis regarding the influence of iris segmentation on the recognition rate10 Nov 2022
- 2022Iris super-resolution using CNNs: is photo-realism important to iris recognition?24 Oct 2022
- 2022Super-Resolution and Image Re-projection for Iris Recognition20 Oct 2022
- 2022Compact multi-scale periocular recognition using SAFE features18 Oct 2022
- 2022Very Low-Resolution Iris Recognition Via Eigen-Patch Super-Resolution and Matcher Fusion18 Oct 2022
- 2022Human Saliency-Driven Patch-based Matching for Interpretable Post-mortem Iris Recognition3 Aug 2022
- 2022A Survey of Super-Resolution in Iris Biometrics with Evaluation of Dictionary-Learning27 Mar 2022