mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Equivariant and Invariant Grounding for Video Question Answering

arXiv 2207.12783 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2022cs.CLcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Video Question Answering (VideoQA) is the task of answering the natural language questions about a video. Producing an answer requires understanding the interplay across visual scenes in video and linguistic semantics in question. However, most leading VideoQA models work as black boxes, which make the visual-linguistic alignment behind the answering process obscure. Such black-box nature calls for visual explainability that reveals ``What part of the video should the model look at to answer the question?''. Only a few works present the visual explanations in a post-hoc fashion, which emulates the target model's answering process via an additional method. Nonetheless, the emulation struggles to faithfully exhibit the visual-linguistic alignment during answering. Instead of post-hoc explainability, we focus on intrinsic interpretability to make the answering process transparent. At its core is grounding the question-critical cues as the causal scene to yield answers, while rolling out the question-irrelevant information as the environment scene. Taking a causal look at VideoQA, we devise a self-interpretable framework, Equivariant and Invariant Grounding for Interpretable VideoQA (EIGV). Specifically, the equivariant grounding encourages the answering to be sensitive to the semantic changes in the causal scene and question; in contrast, the invariant grounding enforces the answering to be insensitive to the changes in the environment scene. By imposing them on the answering process, EIGV is able to distinguish the causal scene from the environment information, and explicitly present the visual-linguistic alignment. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets justify the superiority of EIGV in terms of accuracy and visual interpretability over the leading baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2022.

Builds on

39 of 56 references.

References · 39

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  7. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  8. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  9. 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,013
  10. 2021NExT-QA:Next Phase of Question-Answering to Explaining Temporal Actionscited by 735
  11. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  12. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
27 more
  1. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  2. 2020InterFaceGAN: Interpreting the Disentangled Face Representation Learned by GANscited by 393
  3. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
  4. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
  5. 2020Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Biascited by 266
  6. 2018Videos as Space-Time Region Graphscited by 221
  7. 2022Discovering Invariant Rationales for Graph Neural Networkscited by 186
  8. 2020Hierarchical Conditional Relation Networks for Video Question Answeringcited by 163
  9. 2020Counterfactual Samples Synthesizing for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 153
  10. 2019Heterogeneous Memory Enhanced Multimodal Attention Model for Video Question Answeringcited by 146
  11. 2019Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulationcited by 112
  12. 2021Causal Attention for Vision-Language Taskscited by 111
  13. 2019The Dangers of Post-hoc Interpretability: Unjustified Counterfactual Explanationscited by 97
  14. 2018Motion-Appearance Co-Memory Networks for Video Question Answeringcited by 95
  15. 2022Video Question Answering: Datasets, Algorithms and Challengescited by 84
  16. 2020Location-aware Graph Convolutional Networks for Video Question Answeringcited by 80
  17. 2021Causal Attention for Unbiased Visual Recognitioncited by 80
  18. 2021Video as Conditional Graph Hierarchy for Multi-Granular Question Answeringcited by 68
  19. 2022Invariant Grounding for Video Question Answeringcited by 68
  20. 2021Bridge to Answer: Structure-aware Graph Interaction Network for Video Question Answeringcited by 56
  21. 2016Leveraging Video Descriptions to Learn Video Question Answeringcited by 55
  22. 2020Clicks can be Cheating: Counterfactual Recommendation for Mitigating Clickbait Issuecited by 48
  23. 2021DualVGR: A Dual-Visual Graph Reasoning Unit for Video Question Answeringcited by 35
  24. 2021Hierarchical Object-oriented Spatio-Temporal Reasoning for Video Question Answeringcited by 29
  25. 2020Deep Transformation-Invariant Clusteringcited by 26
  26. 2021Attend What You Need: Motion-Appearance Synergistic Networks for Video Question Answeringcited by 26
  27. 2020Hierarchical Conditional Relation Networks for Multimodal Video Question Answeringcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 8; 2024: 4; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Can I Trust Your Answer? Visually Grounded Video Question Answeringcited by 133
  2. 2023Contrastive Video Question Answering via Video Graph Transformercited by 32
  3. 2023ViGT: Proposal-free Video Grounding with Learnable Token in Transformercited by 22
  4. 2023Discovering Spatio-Temporal Rationales for Video Question Answeringcited by 21
  5. 2025NExT-Mol: 3D Diffusion Meets 1D Language Modeling for 3D Molecule Generationcited by 17
  6. 2022Cognitive Accident Prediction in Driving Scenes: A Multimodality Benchmarkcited by 16
  7. 2023Visual Causal Scene Refinement for Video Question Answeringcited by 16
  8. 2024Weakly Supervised Gaussian Contrastive Grounding with Large Multimodal Models for Video Question Answeringcited by 14
  9. 2025Cross-modal Causal Relation Alignment for Video Question Groundingcited by 12
  10. 2023Efficient Equivariant Transfer Learning from Pretrained Modelscited by 11
  11. 2024Align and Aggregate: Compositional Reasoning with Video Alignment and Answer Aggregation for Video Question-Answeringcited by 9
  12. 2025TOGA: Temporally Grounded Open-Ended Video QA with Weak Supervisioncited by 8
10 more
  1. 2023Redundancy-aware Transformer for Video Question Answeringcited by 7
  2. 2024Scene-Text Grounding for Text-Based Video Question Answeringcited by 5
  3. 2023ATM: Action Temporality Modeling for Video Question Answeringcited by 3
  4. 2025EQ-TAA: Equivariant Traffic Accident Anticipation via Diffusion-Based Accident Video Synthesiscited by 2
  5. 2025Causal-Entity Reflected Egocentric Traffic Accident Video Synthesiscited by 2
  6. 2024Causal Understanding For Video Question Answeringcited by 0
  7. 2025Admitting Ignorance Helps the Video Question Answering Models to Answercited by 0
  8. 2025Video Flow as Time Series: Discovering Temporal Consistency and Variability for VideoQAcited by 0
  9. 2026Disentanglement-Based Equivariant Learning for Compositional VQAcited by 0
  10. 2026Counterfactual Reasoning for Fine-Grained Evidence Disentanglement in VideoQAcited by 0