mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Chunk-aware Alignment and Lexical Constraint for Visual Entailment with Natural Language Explanations

arXiv 2207.11401 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2022cs.CL cs.CV cs.MMcited by 8

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual Entailment with natural language explanations aims to infer the relationship between a text-image pair and generate a sentence to explain the decision-making process. Previous methods rely mainly on a pre-trained vision-language model to perform the relation inference and a language model to generate the corresponding explanation. However, the pre-trained vision-language models mainly build token-level alignment between text and image yet ignore the high-level semantic alignment between the phrases (chunks) and visual contents, which is critical for vision-language reasoning. Moreover, the explanation generator based only on the encoded joint representation does not explicitly consider the critical decision-making points of relation inference. Thus the generated explanations are less faithful to visual-language reasoning. To mitigate these problems, we propose a unified Chunk-aware Alignment and Lexical Constraint based method, dubbed as CALeC. It contains a Chunk-aware Semantic Interactor (arr. CSI), a relation inferrer, and a Lexical Constraint-aware Generator (arr. LeCG). Specifically, CSI exploits the sentence structure inherent in language and various image regions to build chunk-aware semantic alignment. Relation inferrer uses an attention-based reasoning network to incorporate the token-level and chunk-level vision-language representations. LeCG utilizes lexical constraints to expressly incorporate the words or chunks focused by the relation inferrer into explanation generation, improving the faithfulness and informativeness of the explanations. We conduct extensive experiments on three datasets, and experimental results indicate that CALeC significantly outperforms other competitor models on inference accuracy and quality of generated explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 36 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2022.

Builds on

36 of 47 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021SimVLM: Simple Visual Language Model Pretraining with Weak Supervision24 Aug
  2. 2021Seeing Out of tHe bOx: End-to-End Pre-training for Vision-Language Representation Learning7 Apr

Other references · 34

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  6. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  7. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  8. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  9. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  10. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  11. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
  12. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
22 more
  1. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
  2. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,213
  3. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  4. 2022OFA: Unifying Architectures, Tasks, and Modalities Through a Simple Sequence-to-Sequence Learning Frameworkcited by 742
  5. 2018From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 553
  6. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  7. 2015Visual7W: Grounded Question Answering in Imagescited by 315
  8. 2018Graph R-CNN for Scene Graph Generationcited by 296
  9. 2019Visual Entailment: A Novel Task for Fine-Grained Image Understandingcited by 250
  10. 2016Multimodal Compact Bilinear Pooling for Visual Question Answering and Visual Groundingcited by 243
  11. 2018Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidencecited by 179
  12. 2015Exploring Models and Data for Image Question Answeringcited by 139
  13. 2019Graphical Contrastive Losses for Scene Graph Parsingcited by 100
  14. 2020Graph Structured Network for Image-Text Matchingcited by 93
  15. 2021e-ViL: A Dataset and Benchmark for Natural Language Explanations in Vision-Language Taskscited by 84
  16. 2018Faithful Multimodal Explanation for Visual Question Answeringcited by 64
  17. 2021What to Pre-Train on? Efficient Intermediate Task Selectioncited by 62
  18. 2022NLX-GPT: A Model for Natural Language Explanations in Vision and Vision-Language Taskscited by 60
  19. 2020Natural Language Rationales with Full-Stack Visual Reasoning: From Pixels to Semantic Frames to Commonsense Graphscited by 46
  20. 2021Structured Multi-modal Feature Embedding and Alignment for Image-Sentence Retrievalcited by 23
  21. 2020Beyond VQA: Generating Multi-word Answer and Rationale to Visual Questionscited by 19
  22. 2020Robust Explanations for Visual Question Answeringcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 3.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Natural Language Inference Improves Compositionality in Vision-Language Models
  2. 2022Fine-Grained Visual Entailment
  3. 2026Atomic Visual Entailment: Enhancing Zero-Shot Vision-Language Reasoning through Atomic Fact Decomposition and Learned Selection
  4. 2026Inference-Time Structural Reasoning for Compositional Vision-Language Understanding
  5. 2025Large Vision-Language Model Alignment and Misalignment: A Survey Through the Lens of Explainability
  6. 2024RelationVLM: Making Large Vision-Language Models Understand Visual Relations
  7. 2025Probing Vision-Language Understanding through the Visual Entailment Task: promises and pitfalls
  8. 2026Aligning Forest and Trees in Images & Long Captions for Visually Grounded Understanding