mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Atomic Visual Entailment: Enhancing Zero-Shot Vision-Language Reasoning through Atomic Fact Decomposition and Learned Selection

arXiv 2610.05630 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2026cs.CL cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Visual entailment (VE) asks whether an image supports, contradicts, or leaves undecided a textual hypothesis. Strong results come from fine-tuning large vision-language models on labelled data, while zero-shot and hybrid approaches remain far behind. A VE hypothesis often bundles several visual claims, yet existing zero-shot methods reason over it as a single unit. We propose Atomic Visual Entailment (AVE), which decomposes the hypothesis into atomic facts, produces candidate predictions from both the full hypothesis and its facts using frozen vision-language models, and predicts the final label with a lightweight classifier trained only on how those candidates behave. We find that decomposition helps only when the hypothesis context is preserved: judging facts in isolation is worse than not decomposing at all. Full-hypothesis and atomic prediction make complementary errors, and learning which to trust recovers far more of that complementarity than majority voting, reaching 0.803 test accuracy on SNLI-VE without fine-tuning any vision-language model. AVE also localises the visual evidence behind its prediction without region-level supervision. These results suggest that learning which candidate prediction to trust can close much of the gap to fine-tuned systems, offering a practical alternative where fine-tuning a vision-language model directly would need more labelled data or compute than is available.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

Builds on

13 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023UniFine: A Unified and Fine-grained Approach for Zero-shot Vision-Language Understanding3 Jul
  2. 2023IdealGPT: Iteratively Decomposing Vision and Language Reasoning via Large Language Models24 May

Other references · 11

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  4. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,362
  5. 2022OFA: Unifying Architectures, Tasks, and Modalities Through a Simple Sequence-to-Sequence Learning Frameworkcited by 745
  6. 2019Visual Entailment: A Novel Task for Fine-Grained Image Understandingcited by 252
  7. 2023Multimodal Automated Fact-Checking: A Surveycited by 53
  8. 2023Atomic Inference for NLI with Generated Facts as Atomscited by 18
  9. 2025NLI under the Microscope: What Atomic Hypothesis Decomposition Revealscited by 11
  10. 2023Tackling Vision Language Tasks Through Learning Inner Monologuescited by 7
  11. 2026Atomic-SNLI: Fine-Grained Natural Language Inference through Atomic Fact Decompositioncited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Probing Vision-Language Understanding through the Visual Entailment Task: promises and pitfalls
  2. 2026Look Where It Counts: A Free, Label-Free Visual Evidence Signal for Fine-Grained Vision-Language Reasoning
  3. 2024Zero-Shot Visual Reasoning by Vision-Language Models: Benchmarking and Analysis
  4. 2026From Perception to Integration: Revisiting the Internal Dynamics of Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Evidence-RL: Towards Evidence-intensive Visual Reasoning
  6. 2025Unbiased Visual Reasoning with Controlled Visual Inputs
  7. 2026Foveated Reasoning: Stateful, Action-based Visual Focusing for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2026The Perceptual Bandwidth Bottleneck in Vision-Language Models: Active Visual Reasoning via Sequential Experimental Design