mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Robust Explanations for Visual Question Answering

arXiv 2001.08730 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2020cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose a method to obtain robust explanations for visual question answering(VQA) that correlate well with the answers. Our model explains the answers obtained through a VQA model by providing visual and textual explanations. The main challenges that we address are i) Answers and textual explanations obtained by current methods are not well correlated and ii) Current methods for visual explanation do not focus on the right location for explaining the answer. We address both these challenges by using a collaborative correlated module which ensures that even if we do not train for noise based attacks, the enhanced correlation ensures that the right explanation and answer can be generated. We further show that this also aids in improving the generated visual and textual explanations. The use of the correlated module can be thought of as a robust method to verify if the answer and explanations are coherent. We evaluate this model using VQA-X dataset. We observe that the proposed method yields better textual and visual justification that supports the decision. We showcase the robustness of the model against a noise-based perturbation attack using corresponding visual and textual explanations. A detailed empirical analysis is shown. Here we provide source code link for our model urlhttps://github.com/DelTA-Lab-IITK/CCM-WACV.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 6; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: