Bounding generalization error with input compression: An empirical study with infinite-width networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Estimating the Generalization Error (GE) of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) is an important task that often relies on availability of held-out data. The ability to better predict GE based on a single training set may yield overarching DNN design principles to reduce a reliance on trial-and-error, along with other performance assessment advantages. In search of a quantity relevant to GE, we investigate the Mutual Information (MI) between the input and final layer representations, using the infinite-width DNN limit to bound MI. An existing input compression-based GE bound is used to link MI and GE. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first empirical study of this bound. In our attempt to empirically falsify the theoretical bound, we find that it is often tight for best-performing models. Furthermore, it detects randomization of training labels in many cases, reflects test-time perturbation robustness, and works well given only few training samples. These results are promising given that input compression is broadly applicable where MI can be estimated with confidence.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2022.
Builds on
41 of 58 references.
References · 41
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2019On Variational Bounds of Mutual Informationcited by 550
29 more
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
- 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 507
- 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
- 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
- 2015Norm-Based Capacity Control in Neural Networkscited by 299
- 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 299
- 2017Emergence of Invariance and Disentanglement in Deep Representationscited by 213
- 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 186
- 2020Spectral Bias and Task-Model Alignment Explain Generalization in Kernel Regression and Infinitely Wide Neural Networkscited by 166
- 2020Finite Versus Infinite Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 156
- 2019Neural Tangents: Fast and Easy Infinite Neural Networks in Pythoncited by 149
- 2018i-RevNet: Deep Invertible Networkscited by 137
- 2018Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: A PAC-Bayesian Compression Approachcited by 125
- 2021Assessing Generalization of SGD via Disagreementcited by 116
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
- 2016Robustness of classifiers: from adversarial to random noisecited by 87
- 2020In Search of Robust Measures of Generalizationcited by 79
- 2018Entropy and mutual information in models of deep neural networkscited by 50
- 2016The deterministic information bottleneckcited by 42
- 2020Improving Generalization by Controlling Label-Noise Information in Neural Network Weightscited by 35
- 2021The Future is Log-Gaussian: ResNets and Their Infinite-Depth-and-Width Limit at Initializationcited by 33
- 2022Information Flow in Deep Neural Networkscited by 22
- 2021Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Kernel Regressioncited by 21
- 2021RATT: Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Guarantee Generalizationcited by 20
- 2022A Note on "Assessing Generalization of SGD via Disagreement"cited by 16
- 2019Adaptive Estimators Show Information Compression in Deep Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2019Information in Infinite Ensembles of Infinitely-Wide Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2022Generalization Through The Lens Of Leave-One-Out Errorcited by 10
- 2020Training Normalizing Flows with the Information Bottleneck for Competitive Generative Classificationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Squeeze, Recover and Relabel: Dataset Condensation at ImageNet Scale From A New Perspectivecited by 136
- 2023How Does Information Bottleneck Help Deep Learning?cited by 92
- 2024Cauchy-Schwarz Divergence Information Bottleneck for Regressioncited by 9
- 2023Text Descriptions are Compressive and Invariant Representations for Visual Learningcited by 7
- 2024Cauchy-Schwarz Divergence Information Bottleneck for Regression27 Apr 2024
- 2023Text Descriptions are Compressive and Invariant Representations for Visual Learning10 Jul 2023
- 2023Squeeze, Recover and Relabel: Dataset Condensation at ImageNet Scale From A New Perspective22 Jun 2023
- 2023How Does Information Bottleneck Help Deep Learning?30 May 2023