mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generalization Through The Lens Of Leave-One-Out Error

arXiv 2203.03443 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2022cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the tremendous empirical success of deep learning models to solve various learning tasks, our theoretical understanding of their generalization ability is very limited. Classical generalization bounds based on tools such as the VC dimension or Rademacher complexity, are so far unsuitable for deep models and it is doubtful that these techniques can yield tight bounds even in the most idealistic settings (Nagarajan & Kolter, 2019). In this work, we instead revisit the concept of leave-one-out (LOO) error to measure the generalization ability of deep models in the so-called kernel regime. While popular in statistics, the LOO error has been largely overlooked in the context of deep learning. By building upon the recently established connection between neural networks and kernel learning, we leverage the closed-form expression for the leave-one-out error, giving us access to an efficient proxy for the test error. We show both theoretically and empirically that the leave-one-out error is capable of capturing various phenomena in generalization theory, such as double descent, random labels or transfer learning. Our work therefore demonstrates that the leave-one-out error provides a tractable way to estimate the generalization ability of deep neural networks in the kernel regime, opening the door to potential, new research directions in the field of generalization.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2022.

Builds on

44 of 75 references.

References · 44

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  7. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  8. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  9. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  10. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
  11. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
  12. 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
32 more
  1. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
  2. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
  3. 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
  4. 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
  5. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
  6. 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 507
  7. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
  8. 2018Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networkscited by 314
  9. 2017A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Spectrally-Normalized Margin Bounds for Neural Networkscited by 309
  10. 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 306
  11. 2017Nearly-tight VC-dimension and pseudodimension bounds for piecewise linear neural networkscited by 304
  12. 2015Norm-Based Capacity Control in Neural Networkscited by 299
  13. 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 223
  14. 2017Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noisecited by 164
  15. 2019Graph Neural Tangent Kernel: Fusing Graph Neural Networks with Graph Kernelscited by 160
  16. 2019Neural Tangents: Fast and Easy Infinite Neural Networks in Pythoncited by 149
  17. 2020Tensor Programs II: Neural Tangent Kernel for Any Architecturecited by 139
  18. 2020Evaluation of Neural Architectures Trained with Square Loss vs Cross-Entropy in Classification Taskscited by 137
  19. 2020Infinite attention: NNGP and NTK for deep attention networkscited by 117
  20. 2015Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAICcited by 110
  21. 2020Double Trouble in Double Descent : Bias and Variance(s) in the Lazy Regimecited by 95
  22. 2017Entropy-SGD optimizes the prior of a PAC-Bayes bound: Generalization properties of Entropy-SGD and data-dependent priorscited by 81
  23. 2020Understanding Double Descent Requires a Fine-Grained Bias-Variance Decompositioncited by 75
  24. 2020Why Do Deep Residual Networks Generalize Better than Deep Feedforward Networks? -- A Neural Tangent Kernel Perspectivecited by 60
  25. 2020Implicit Regularization of Random Feature Modelscited by 54
  26. 2017Cross-validation failure: small sample sizes lead to large error barscited by 41
  27. 2020Discriminative Jackknife: Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Learning via Higher-Order Influence Functionscited by 34
  28. 2021Rethinking Influence Functions of Neural Networks in the Over-parameterized Regimecited by 26
  29. 2020Label-Aware Neural Tangent Kernel: Toward Better Generalization and Local Elasticitycited by 18
  30. 2021Uniform Convergence, Adversarial Spheres and a Simple Remedycited by 8
  31. 2020DeepNNK: Explaining deep models and their generalization using polytope interpolationcited by 5
  32. 2021Double-descent curves in neural networks: a new perspective using Gaussian processescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

10 papers.