mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Progress and limitations of deep networks to recognize objects in unusual poses

arXiv 2207.08034 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2022cs.CVcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep networks should be robust to rare events if they are to be successfully deployed in high-stakes real-world applications (e.g., self-driving cars). Here we study the capability of deep networks to recognize objects in unusual poses. We create a synthetic dataset of images of objects in unusual orientations, and evaluate the robustness of a collection of 38 recent and competitive deep networks for image classification. We show that classifying these images is still a challenge for all networks tested, with an average accuracy drop of 29.5% compared to when the objects are presented upright. This brittleness is largely unaffected by various network design choices, such as training losses (e.g., supervised vs. self-supervised), architectures (e.g., convolutional networks vs. transformers), dataset modalities (e.g., images vs. image-text pairs), and data-augmentation schemes. However, networks trained on very large datasets substantially outperform others, with the best network testedunicodex2014Noisy Student EfficentNet-L2 trained on JFT-300Municodex2014showing a relatively small accuracy drop of only 14.5% on unusual poses. Nevertheless, a visual inspection of the failures of Noisy Student reveals a remaining gap in robustness with the human visual system. Furthermore, combining multiple object transformationsunicodex20143D-rotations and scalingunicodex2014further degrades the performance of all networks. Altogether, our results provide another measurement of the robustness of deep networks that is important to consider when using them in the real world. Code and datasets are available at https://github.com/amro-kamal/ObjectPose.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2022.

Builds on

36 of 42 references.

References · 36

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  6. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  7. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  8. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  9. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  10. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  11. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  12. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
24 more
  1. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
  2. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  3. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  4. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  5. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
  6. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  7. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  8. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
  9. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  10. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  11. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 802
  12. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
  13. 2021Common Objects in 3D: Large-Scale Learning and Evaluation of Real-life 3D Category Reconstructioncited by 646
  14. 2021ConViT: Improving Vision Transformers with Soft Convolutional Inductive Biasescited by 484
  15. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  16. 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 372
  17. 2021When Vision Transformers Outperform ResNets without Pre-training or Strong Data Augmentationscited by 259
  18. 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 248
  19. 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
  20. 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
  21. 2018Strike (with) a Pose: Neural Networks Are Easily Fooled by Strange Poses of Familiar Objectscited by 143
  22. 2022Revisiting Weakly Supervised Pre-Training of Visual Perception Modelscited by 116
  23. 2017A Study and Comparison of Human and Deep Learning Recognition Performance Under Visual Distortionscited by 107
  24. 2019Do Image Classifiers Generalize Across Time?cited by 59

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: