mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Peer-induced Fairness: A Causal Approach for Algorithmic Fairness Auditing

arXiv 2408.02558 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2024stat.AP cs.CY q-fin.CPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act taking effect on 1 August 2024, high-risk AI applications must adhere to stringent transparency and fairness standards. This paper addresses a crucial question: how can we scientifically audit algorithmic fairness? Current methods typically remain at the basic detection stage of auditing, without accounting for more complex scenarios. We propose a novel framework, ``peer-induced fairness'', which combines the strengths of counterfactual fairness and peer comparison strategy, creating a reliable and robust tool for auditing algorithmic fairness. Our framework is universal, adaptable to various domains, and capable of handling different levels of data quality, including skewed distributions. Moreover, it can distinguish whether adverse decisions result from algorithmic discrimination or inherent limitations of the subjects, thereby enhancing transparency. This framework can serve as both a self-assessment tool for AI developers and an external assessment tool for auditors to ensure compliance with the EU AI Act. We demonstrate its utility in small and medium-sized enterprises access to finance, uncovering significant unfairness-41.51% of micro-firms face discrimination compared to non-micro firms. These findings highlight the framework's potential for broader applications in ensuring equitable AI-driven decision-making.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2024.

Builds on

26 of 65 references.

References · 26

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
  3. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
  4. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  5. 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 181
  6. 2020Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimscited by 165
  7. 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 127
  8. 2021Fairness in Credit Scoring: Assessment, Implementation and Profit Implicationscited by 65
  9. 2020Counterfactual Fairness with Disentangled Causal Effect Variational Autoencodercited by 45
  10. 2020FAE: A Fairness-Aware Ensemble Frameworkcited by 34
  11. 2019Counterfactual Reasoning for Fair Clinical Risk Predictioncited by 28
  12. 2022Active Fairness Auditingcited by 27
14 more
  1. 2021Testing Group Fairness via Optimal Transport Projectionscited by 23
  2. 2022Fairness and Explainability: Bridging the Gap Towards Fair Model Explanationscited by 22
  3. 2023Statistical Inference for Fairness Auditingcited by 20
  4. 2020Auditing ML Models for Individual Bias and Unfairnesscited by 18
  5. 2020Experimental Evaluation of Algorithm-Assisted Human Decision-Making: Application to Pretrial Public Safety Assessmentcited by 18
  6. 2019Fairness through Equality of Effortcited by 15
  7. 2022Equal Improvability: A New Fairness Notion Considering the Long-term Impactcited by 13
  8. 2022Towards A Holistic View of Bias in Machine Learning: Bridging Algorithmic Fairness and Imbalanced Learningcited by 10
  9. 2020Fairness by Explicability and Adversarial SHAP Learningcited by 9
  10. 2021Online Fairness-Aware Learning with Imbalanced Data Streamscited by 8
  11. 2021Fairness over time in dynamic resource allocation with an application in Healthcarecited by 3
  12. 2022A Framework for Fair Decision-making Over Time with Time-invariant Utilitiescited by 3
  13. 2022Representative Pure Risk Estimation by Using Data from Epidemiologic Studies, Surveys, and Registries: Estimating Risks for Minority Subgroupscited by 1
  14. 2023Within-group fairness: A guidance for more sound between-group fairnesscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.