mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Keep your Distance: Determining Sampling and Distance Thresholds in Machine Learning Monitoring

arXiv 2207.05078 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning~(ML) has provided promising results in recent years across different applications and domains. However, in many cases, qualities such as reliability or even safety need to be ensured. To this end, one important aspect is to determine whether or not ML components are deployed in situations that are appropriate for their application scope. For components whose environments are open and variable, for instance those found in autonomous vehicles, it is therefore important to monitor their operational situation to determine its distance from the ML components' trained scope. If that distance is deemed too great, the application may choose to consider the ML component outcome unreliable and switch to alternatives, e.g. using human operator input instead. SafeML is a model-agnostic approach for performing such monitoring, using distance measures based on statistical testing of the training and operational datasets. Limitations in setting SafeML up properly include the lack of a systematic approach for determining, for a given application, how many operational samples are needed to yield reliable distance information as well as to determine an appropriate distance threshold. In this work, we address these limitations by providing a practical approach and demonstrate its use in a well known traffic sign recognition problem, and on an example using the CARLA open-source automotive simulator.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2022.

Builds on

13 of 34 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  2. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  3. 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
  4. 2015On Wasserstein Two Sample Testing and Related Families of Nonparametric Testscited by 165
  5. 2017Feature-Guided Black-Box Safety Testing of Deep Neural Networkscited by 48
  6. 2020Importance-Driven Deep Learning System Testingcited by 24
  7. 2020SafeML: Safety Monitoring of Machine Learning Classifiers through Statistical Difference Measurecited by 16
  8. 2020Efficient Certification of Spatial Robustnesscited by 11
  9. 2021Assessing the Reliability of Deep Learning Classifiers Through Robustness Evaluation and Operational Profilescited by 11
  10. 2021Detecting Operational Adversarial Examples for Reliable Deep Learningcited by 8
  11. 2019A Provable Defense for Deep Residual Networkscited by 5
  12. 2019Detection and Mitigation of Rare Subclasses in Deep Neural Network Classifierscited by 4
1 more
  1. 2021Autoencoder-based Semantic Novelty Detection: Towards Dependable AI-based Systemscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

4 papers.