mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detecting Operational Adversarial Examples for Reliable Deep Learning

arXiv 2104.06015 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2021cs.SE cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The utilisation of Deep Learning (DL) raises new challenges regarding its dependability in critical applications. Sound verification and validation methods are needed to assure the safe and reliable use of DL. However, state-of-the-art debug testing methods on DL that aim at detecting adversarial examples (AEs) ignore the operational profile, which statistically depicts the software's future operational use. This may lead to very modest effectiveness on improving the software's delivered reliability, as the testing budget is likely to be wasted on detecting AEs that are unrealistic or encountered very rarely in real-life operation. In this paper, we first present the novel notion of "operational AEs" which are AEs that have relatively high chance to be seen in future operation. Then an initial design of a new DL testing method to efficiently detect "operational AEs" is provided, as well as some insights on our prospective research plan.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2021.

Builds on

5 of 11 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  2. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
  3. 2017Generating Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 182
  4. 2020A Safety Framework for Critical Systems Utilising Deep Neural Networkscited by 19
  5. 2021Operation is the hardest teacher: estimating DNN accuracy looking for mispredictionscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

8 papers.